(b)(4).The dhr for the returned instrument was reviewed and found completely without any irregularities.This instrument was manufactured at the tecomet, inc.(b)(4) facility as part of a 50pc.Lot in february of 2016.The returned instrument was evaluated and found that as received the open jaw gap was undersized to print specifications.Further evaluation showed that this instrument as received was unable to load a clip thus we are able to validate this complaint.Further evaluation showed that the luer flush port was slightly loose and when removed it was found that it was gouged/damaged on its outer diameter signifying that it had been tampered with and possibly removed.After removal of luer port we rotated tube assy.360 and re-installed flush port and then re-measured the open jaw gap and it measured to print specifications.We are unable to determine how this instrument has been stored , handled and cleaned by the end users facility.Other remarks: parts were 100% visually inspected and tested at the tecomet, inc.(b)(4) facility before instruments were sent to customer.No irr egularities were found and or reported at the time of inspection and assembly of the product, as this is a standardized process for all instruments manufactured at this facility.At this time it is suspected that this instrument has been tampered with at some time after leaving this facility in february of 2016.No corrective action required at this time.
|