• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

THORATEC CORPORATION HEARTMATE II LVAS; LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 104911
Device Problem Cut In Material (2454)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 01/31/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device unique identifier (udi) ¿ device was manufactured prior to the udi labeling implementation.Approximate age of device ¿ 4 years and 8 months.The patient remains ongoing on lvad support; however, a portion of the percutaneous lead was received for investigation.The evaluation is not yet complete.No further information was provided.A supplemental report will be submitted when the manufacturer¿s investigation is completed.
 
Event Description
The patient was implanted with a left ventricular assist device (lvad) on (b)(6) 2013.It was reported that a percutaneous lead repair was requested due to cosmetic damage.On 06feb2018, technical services performed distal end percutaneous lead (driveline) replacement without issue.The lvad was placed on regular grounded patient cable post replacement.The patient was to be released to home.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The percutaneous lead was tested for electrical continuity in the condition that it was received and did not reveal any discontinuities or shorts.Examination of the percutaneous lead noted several tears under the rescue tapes.However, the underlying bionate was free of damage.Upon removal of the silicone sleeves, overall metal braided shield deterioration was noted.In addition, a minor kink was observed approximately 15 inches from the metal connector.The silicone jacket, clear bionate, and metal braided shield were removed in order to examine the underlying wires.Visual inspection of the percutaneous lead did not reveal any evidence of mechanical damage or breakdown of the wire insulation.The percutaneous lead was submerged in a saline bath for high-potential testing to check for current leakage through each wire's insulation.The test did not reveal any insulation breaches that would have contributed to an electrical short.The patient was placed on regular grounded patient cable post repair and discharged.The patient remains ongoing on the left ventricular assist system (lvas) and no further related issues have been reported.A review of the device history records revealed no deviations from manufacturing or quality assurance specifications.No further information was provided.The manufacturer is closing the file on this event.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HEARTMATE II LVAS
Type of Device
LEFT VENTRICULAR ASSIST DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer (Section G)
THORATEC CORPORATION
6035 stoneridge drive
pleasanton CA 94588
Manufacturer Contact
bob fryc
6101 stoneridge dr.
pleasanton, CA 94588
7818528390
MDR Report Key7301371
MDR Text Key101347475
Report Number2916596-2018-00725
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DSQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received02/27/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date10/31/2015
Device Catalogue Number104911
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer02/07/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received03/16/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured04/04/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age76 YR
Patient Weight76
-
-