• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO) LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 9004
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Hypersensitivity/Allergic reaction (1907); High Blood Pressure/ Hypertension (1908); Rash (2033)
Event Date 02/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Analysis: the samples were not returned from the user facility; therefore, device evaluations are unable to be performed.A lot history review revealed this is the only complaint associated with this lot.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicates the lot was manufactured to specification.Conclusion: the actual samples were not received for evaluation.The dhr found nothing to indicate a manufacturing related cause for this event.Based on the instructions for use (ifu), the occurrence of an allergic reaction, hypertension, and a rash are inherent risks of a pta procedure with a paclitaxel drug coated balloon.Furthermore, the patient was reportedly treated with four lutonix dcb's, which exceeded the maximum amount of paclitaxel that was clinically evaluated for safety and effectiveness in a human patient.The hcp administered hydrochloride and epinephrine.The patient was asymptomatic at the conclusion of the procedure.If additional information becomes known to the manufacturer, a supplemental report will be provided with all relevant information.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
 
Event Description
It was reported after treatment with four lutonix percutaneous transluminal drug coated balloon (dcb) dilatation catheters reportedly the patient experienced hypertension, and an itchy red rash.The health care professional (hcp) administered hydrochloride and epinephrine.At the conclusion of the procedure, the patient was asymptomatic.No further adverse patient outcomes were reported.The lutonix dcb's were discarded by the user facility and are not available for evaluation.This is one of four products involved with the reported event and the associated manufacturer¿s report numbers are 3006513822-2018-00034, 3006513822-2018-00035, and 3006513822-2018-00036.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
LUTONIX 035 DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Type of Device
DRUG COATED BALLOON PTA CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer (Section G)
C.R. BARD, INC. (GFO)
289 bay road
queensbury NY 12804
Manufacturer Contact
john risse
9409 science center dr
new hope, MN 55428
7634632917
MDR Report Key7309468
MDR Text Key101378558
Report Number3006513822-2018-00037
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code ONU
UDI-Device Identifier00801741123306
UDI-Public(01)00801741123306
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P130024
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/02/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/25/2020
Device Model Number9004
Device Catalogue NumberLX3513061505F
Device Lot NumberGFBW2259
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured11/03/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization;
Patient Age83 YR
Patient Weight68
-
-