• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C1240
Device Problems Electrical Overstress (2924); Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 01/22/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the renal artery using ruby coils.During the procedure, the physician successfully deployed and detached three ruby coils using a px slim delivery microcatheter (px slim).Another ruby coil then became stuck within the px slim, and therefore the px slim was removed with the ruby coil inside.The procedure then ended at this point because the existing coil mass was sufficient.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The pusher assembly was kinked in multiple locations.The embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly with the proximal constraint sphere intact, inside its introducer sheath with offset coil winds.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the ruby coil embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly and stuck inside it introducer sheath with offset coil winds.This damage likely occurred due to forceful retraction against resistance, which may have caused the distal section of the pusher assembly to elongate beyond the reach of the pull wire, which would result in the embolization coil detaching from the pusher assembly.The root cause of the initial resistance and the embolization coil getting stuck within the px slim could not be determined.Further evaluation of the returned device revealed that the pusher assembly was kinked in multiple locations.These kinks were likely incidental and likely occurred while packaging the device for return to penumbra.The embolization coil was detached from its pusher assembly and, therefore, the returned ruby coil could not be functionally tested for the reported issue.The px slim referred to in the complaint was not returned for to penumbra for evaluation.Penumbra coils and catheters are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
MDR Report Key7332441
MDR Text Key102225875
Report Number3005168196-2018-00542
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548013237
UDI-Public00814548013237
Combination Product (y/n)Y
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,02/13/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date12/31/2019
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C1240
Device Lot NumberF61798
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/12/2018
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Initial Date Manufacturer Received 02/13/2018
Initial Date FDA Received03/12/2018
Supplement Dates Manufacturer Received04/18/2018
05/02/2018
Supplement Dates FDA Received05/02/2018
12/04/2019
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age41 YR
-
-