The device was discarded by the customer.Without the return of the product, it is not possible to determine if damages or defects exist on the product, nor can a root cause or any potential contributing factors be identified.A device history record review has been initiated to assess that the device met all specifications upon distribution.Upon completion, a supplemental report will be sent with the investigation results.An engineering evaluation has been initiated to assess for any manufacturing-related processes which could be correlated to the complaint.Invasive procedures involve some patient risks.Although serious complications are relatively uncommon, the physician is advised, before deciding to insert or use the catheter, to consider the potential benefits in relation to the possible complications.The techniques for insertion, methods of using the catheter to obtain patient data information, and the occurrence of complications is well described in the literature.With any hemodynamic monitoring, temperature readings can change quickly and dramatically.A temperature reading that changes dramatically can be an indication to the user to begin the troubleshooting process before a cardiac output measurement is attempted.The patient¿s body temperature by can be obtained by different means and compared to the temperature obtained from the catheter.If they do not correlate to the clinician¿s satisfaction, it is common clinical practice to the abort the attempt to obtain cardiac output.The catheter can be exchanged if desired.It is unknown whether user or procedural factors contributed to the stated event.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits on a monthly basis, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.
|
It was reported that during use of a volume view set, the temperature values ¿jumped¿ between 0 to 43°c after completing the bolus injection.The clinician recognized the temperature values as abnormal compared to the patient condition and manual measurement obtained with a digital meter.The patient was not treated based on the temperature values provided and there was no allegation of patient injury.It was noted that all volume view parameters were being measured at the time of the issue; however, only the temperature values were reported as inaccurate.There were no error messages observed.The customer declined to provide patient demographics.
|