• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT XIENCE XPEDITION 48 EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT XIENCE XPEDITION 48 EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1070275-48
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem Vomiting (2144)
Event Date 01/29/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4): during processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device is expected to be returned for evaluation.It has not yet been received.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a heavily tortuous, heavily calcified, and de novo lesion located in the proximal circumflex artery that was 95% stenosed.Pre-dilatation was performed with a 1.5 x 6 mm, 2.5 x 8 mm, and a 2.75 x 18 mm unspecified balloon catheters.A 2.75 x 48 mm xience xpedition stent could not cross the lesion due to the anatomy, and when the stent delivery system was removed, the shaft separated inside the patient.The separated portion was simply pulled out by the proximal part of the shaft.Another 2.75 x 48 mm xience xpediton was used, but failed to cross due to the anatomy.The procedure was successfully completed with a 2.75 x 18 mm and a 2.75 x 28 mm xience alpine stents.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure and no adverse patient effects.No additional information was provided.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).A visual and dimensional inspection were performed on the returned device.The reported shaft detachment was confirmed.The reported failure to advance could not be tested as it was based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history did not indicate a lot specific quality issue.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure.Based on the information reviewed and analysis of the returned device, there is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XIENCE XPEDITION 48 EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLONMEL, IRELAND REG# 9616693
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7342074
MDR Text Key102586945
Report Number2024168-2018-01862
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIN
PMA/PMN Number
P110019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/27/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/15/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/27/2020
Device Catalogue Number1070275-48
Device Lot Number7081741
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/10/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/20/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured08/01/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-