|
Catalog Number 400SMTHXSFT0102 |
Device Problems
Failure to Advance (2524); Physical Resistance (2578); Mechanical Jam (2983)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 02/25/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly and the coil had offset coil winds.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned device revealed that the smart coil embolization coil winds were offset.This type of damage typically occurs due to improper handling during use.If the introducer sheath is not properly aligned within the hub of the microcatheter prior to advancement, resistance may be experienced and damage such as this may occur.The offset coil winds likely prevented the smart coil from being advanced within its introducer sheath and into the non-penumbra microcatheter.The smart coil was attempted to be advanced through a demonstration microcatheter.While attempt to advance the smart coil through the microcatheter; resistance was encountered as the coil offset coil winds bunched-up inside the introducer sheath and the smart coil could not be advanced any further.The non-penumbra microcatheter referred to in the complaint was not returned to penumbra for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
|
Event Description
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure treating a gastrointestinal bleed using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician advanced a smart coil into a non-penumbra microcatheter, however then removed the smart coil to reposition the microcatheter.Upon attempting to re-advance the same smart coil into the microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance and the smart coil became stuck and unable to advance within its introducer sheath.The procedure was therefore completed using a new smart coil.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|