• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION TRANSVAGINAL MESH; GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC KIT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION TRANSVAGINAL MESH; GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC KIT Back to Search Results
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Unspecified Infection (1930); Pain (1994); Prolapse (2475)
Event Date 01/01/2012
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Reporter states that in 2012 she had a transvaginal mesh implanted.Since then she has been experiencing multiple infections in various areas including her esophagus, along with pain and suffering.She has undergone a total of 4 surgeries.First surgery was the placement of the mesh in 2012.Second was the explant of the mesh in (b)(6) 2015.Third was another surgery to correct bladder issues.The 4th was to treat a rectal prolapse which she believes was related to the transvaginal mesh.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TRANSVAGINAL MESH
Type of Device
GYNECOLOGICAL LAPAROSCOPIC KIT
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
MDR Report Key7376799
MDR Text Key103790907
Report NumberMW5076170
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OHD
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Voluntary
Reporter Occupation Patient
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 03/27/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received03/27/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator No Information
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No Information
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age58 YR
-
-