Catalog Number 07027737190 |
Device Problem
Low Test Results (2458)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 03/19/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This event occurred in (b)(6).
|
|
Event Description
|
The customer complained of results for 1 patient tested for elecsys prolactin ii (prolactin ii) on a cobas e801 module that did not correspond to the clinical history of the patient.The initial prolactin ii result from the e801 module was 7.35 ng/ml and was reported outside of the laboratory> the result was questioned by the physician as the patient had symptoms related to high prolactin results (galactorrhea and evaluation of a brain tumor).The patient was undergoing a biopsy for a possible diagnosis of prolactionoma.The sample was repeated at a different laboratory using the siemens centaur method and the result was 4.9 ng/ml.On (b)(6) 2018 the sample was diluted by the instrument with the following results: 1:50 result 12.0 ng/ml; 1:100 result 15.9 ng/ml; 1:900 result 95.8 ng/ml.The sample was manually diluted with the following results: 1:1 result 3.01 ng/ml; 1:10 result 8.45 ng/ml; 1:100 result 1:100 18.1 ng/ml; 1:1000 result 104 ng/ml.The sample was also repeated at a different laboratory using the siemens centaur method and the result was 4.9 ng/ml.The customer is not sure which result or results are correct.There was no allegation that an adverse event occurred.The e801 module serial number was (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The qc data provided by the customer was acceptable.It was determined that the initial prolactin ii result of 7.35 ng/ml was correct.The customer's increasing prolactin ii results were caused by diluting a sample that was within the measuring range and that did not qualify for dilution.The difference in the initial result of 7.35 ng/ml and the result of 3.01 ng/ml was due to the peg treatment.Product labeling addresses sample dilution and peg treatment.It is not known if the centaur result was generated with or without peg treatment.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The customer thinks there may be macro prolactin or some kind of interference in the patient sample.Based on the information provided, a general interference in the patient sample is not suspected.Samples with prolactin concentrations above the measuring range can be diluted.The recommended dilution is 1:10.The concentration of the diluted sample must be > 50 uiu/ml or > 2.4 ng/ml.In this case, the sample was neither above the measuring range nor > 2.4 ng/ml after dilution and before the final result calculation.The customer's increasing results were caused by diluting a sample that was within the measuring range and diluted with very high dilution factors (1:50 and higher).If the customer suspects an interference, product labeling advises to perform peg precipitaiton testing and not dilution testing: "in case of implausible high prolactin values a precipitation by polyethylene glycol (peg) is recommended in order to estimate the amount of the biological active monomeric prolactin.".
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The customer provided updated information related to the clinical condition of the patient.The physician stated the patient had a high prolactin 1 year ago and since then, the patient has received treatment with a prl inhibitor which corresponds to the low prolactin ii results produced by the device.The customer also clarified that the prolactin ii result of 3.01 ng/ml was obtained by peg precipitation testing.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|