• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS DOT PROV SP 3F SL MAX; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS DOT PROV SP 3F SL MAX; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS Back to Search Results
Catalog Number S9173108PD
Device Problem Split (2537)
Patient Problem Venipuncture (2129)
Event Date 03/12/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
 
Event Description
It was reported that picc split in half where the hub meets the catheter; patient was not harmed, but line had to be removed and patient was stuck again.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, frequency analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a detached hub is confirmed; however the cause is unknown.One 3 fr single lumen powerpicc provena was returned for evaluation.An initial visual observation showed the luer connector was detached from the extension tubing.Use residue was observed throughout the returned sample.The sample was flushed with a 12 ml syringe of water and was found to be patent to infusion.No leaks were observed when the sample was pressurized.Blood residue was expelled from the catheter sample when it was flushed.A microscopic observation revealed the break surface of the extension tubing of the purple lumen was uneven and rough and exhibited cracks/fissures and beach marks, which are indicative of material fatigue; however the root cause of the break is unknown at this time.A lot history review (lhr) review is not possible, as no manufacturing lot number has been provided by the complainant.
 
Event Description
It was reported that picc split in half where the hub meets the catheter; patient was not harmed, but line had to be removed and patient was stuck again.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
DOT PROV SP 3F SL MAX
Type of Device
CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS
Manufacturer (Section D)
BARD ACCESS SYSTEMS
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city UT 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas
MX  
Manufacturer Contact
kelsey erickson
605 n. 5600 w.
salt lake city, UT 84116
8015225937
MDR Report Key7397756
MDR Text Key104566474
Report Number3006260740-2018-00597
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
UDI-Device Identifier00801741134425
UDI-Public(01)00801741134425
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K162443
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Recall
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/09/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/04/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberS9173108PD
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/26/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Event Location Hospital
Date Manufacturer Received04/11/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age20 MO
-
-