• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: TELEFLEX MEDICAL PU MDP-60K DISP PUNCH 6.0MM; INSTRUMENTS, SURGICAL, CARDIOV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

TELEFLEX MEDICAL PU MDP-60K DISP PUNCH 6.0MM; INSTRUMENTS, SURGICAL, CARDIOV Back to Search Results
Catalog Number MDP-60K
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907)
Patient Problems Tissue Damage (2104); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 03/16/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The device has not been returned for investigation.Teleflex will continue to monitor and trend related events.
 
Event Description
It was reported that when the doctor used the 6.0mm punch on the external iliac artery he said it disintegrated and stuck to the tissue.He had difficulty removing it.The punch caused damage to the tissue and the external iliac artery.It necessitated us going back into slush.The damage to the tissue required us to call the vascular team to come in and repair the artery with a graft.The patient's condition is unknown at this time.The device and packaging were saved and brought to clinical engineering for evaluation.An exemplar from the same lot was also obtained.It seems a piece of tissue was jammed between the cutting ring and the center plunger and the plastic ring on the end of the instrument broke off when the action was reversed, making it impossible to clear the jammed tissue.Exemplar device from same lot was tested with a piece of rubber glove.While it punched a hole in the glove, the punched out section jammed in the cutter.When trying to free the jam, the plastic ring popper off and flew across the room and was lost.So there are two issues; the cutter tends to jam and the plastic ring on the distal end of the device is easy to break off when trying to clear a jam.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Qn# (b)(4).The device history record of batch number 74h1702723 has been reviewed and no issues or discrepancies were found which could potentially relate to this complaint.No rejection report was originated for the lot in question that can be associated to the complaint reported.Dhr shows that the product was assembled and inspected according to our specifications.One sample of fg mdp-60k was received from customer for evaluation.Sample doesn't have any signs of use, however it was observed that the metal parts that perform the cut are jammed.Additionally, no o-ring is present.A fully dimensional inspection will be performed as part of the investigation that will be carried out under the nonconformance.Preventive maintenance records of the dukane welder duw-14 which is the equipment that welds the o-ring was reviewed, records of the months of august and september 2017 were requested since the production lot occurred on september 04, 2017.No malfunctions were found that could cause the issue reported.Other remarks: based on the inspection made on the sample received (jammed and missing o-ring), the reported issue has been confirmed, however the cause of both conditions is unknown.Therefore the nonconformance has been created in order to conduct some additional testing to determine the root cause.Based on the conditions observed on the sample received (jammed and loose o-ring) the customer complaint is confirm.Nonconformance has been issued in order to obtain the root cause.Additionally, the personnel of the manufacturing and quality departments have been notified as awareness.
 
Event Description
It was reported that when the doctor used the 6.0mm punch on the external iliac artery he said it disintegrated and stuck to the tissue.He had difficulty removing it.The punch caused damage to the tissue and the external iliac artery.It necessitated us going back into slush.The damage to the tissue required us to call the vascular team to come in and repair the artery with a graft.The patient's condition is unknown at this time.The device and packaging were saved and brought to clinical engineering for evaluation.An exemplar from the same lot was also obtained.It seems a piece of tissue was jammed between the cutting ring and the center plunger and the plastic ring on the end of the instrument broke off when the action was reversed, making it impossible to clear the jammed tissue.Exemplar device from same lot was tested with a piece of rubber glove.While it punched a hole in the glove, the punched out section jammed in the cutter.When trying to free the jam, the plastic ring popper off and flew across the room and was lost.So there are two issues; the cutter tends to jam and the plastic ring on the distal end of the device is easy to break off when trying to clear a jam.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PU MDP-60K DISP PUNCH 6.0MM
Type of Device
INSTRUMENTS, SURGICAL, CARDIOV
Manufacturer (Section D)
TELEFLEX MEDICAL
research triangle park NC
Manufacturer (Section G)
TELEFLEX MEDICAL
parque industrial finsa
nuevo laredo 88275
MX   88275
Manufacturer Contact
jasmine brown
3015 carrington mill blvd
morrisville, NC 27560
9193614124
MDR Report Key7406628
MDR Text Key104674554
Report Number3004365956-2018-00111
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DWS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 03/27/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/09/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date07/29/2022
Device Catalogue NumberMDP-60K
Device Lot Number74H1702723
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/23/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received05/11/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured08/24/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-