The lot number was provided.A review of the approved device history records indicated the lot met all release criteria.A lot history trending review was performed and there were no similar complaints for this lot number.The implant coil was noted to be stretched with no monofilament tie knot, and intermittent open gaps on the distal section.The attachment section of the pusher appeared to have a tie knot.The pusher was dissected to expose the attachment tether monofilament and check on its shape and rebound length.The attachment tether monofilament appeared to be within the heater coil section of the pusher, which is indicative of a low rebound length and low tensile value.Based on the available information and evaluation of the returned device, the complaint of a detached coil can be confirmed.The root cause cannot be determined; however, the device exhibits evidence that it was subjected to tensile forces that exceeded its strength specifications.
|
It was reported that multiple attempts were made to implant the embolization coil; however, the coil was unable to be implanted.During withdrawal, the coil detached inside the microcatheter.The coil was removed in its entirety along with the microcatheter from the patient.There was no reported intervention or patient injury.The patient was reported to be doing well post procedure.
|