• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTERSTIM II; STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE Back to Search Results
Model Number 3058
Device Problems Energy Output To Patient Tissue Incorrect (1209); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Micturition Urgency (1871); Incontinence (1928); Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Urinary Retention (2119); Therapeutic Response, Decreased (2271); Urinary Frequency (2275)
Event Date 08/25/2015
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event was reported as follows: loss of therapy (b)(6) 2018; residual stimulation feeling: (b)(6) 2018.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from the consumer regarding a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for gastrointestinal/pelvic floor.It was reported that, about a week and a half ago ((b)(6) 2018), the device wasn¿t ¿working properly¿ and the patient felt like they had to go, that they kept leaking (loss of therapy).This occurred in (b)(6) 2018.The family member called the ¿local person¿ where it was suggested to turn the device off and leave it off for 24 hours then start it back on.The device was turned off on (b)(6) 2018 but the patient still felt the stimulation and it seemed to be getting stronger.They met with the local person last night and it was made sure everything was off and all the programs were off.It was reviewed with the reporter that some residual stimulation would be expected but usually not for this long.It was noted that the healthcare professional (hcp) had already done an mri and that an x-ray was scheduled for tomorrow morning ((b)(6) 2018).It was advised the patient follow up with their hcp for the issues.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the healthcare professional.The hcp provided previous exam notes which showed: it was reported that at exam on 2015-08-25 the patient reported he was doing very well with the implant with a decrease in frequency.The patient noted intermittent stim in the left leg.Patient had another follow-up appointment on (b)(6)2016 and also was pleased with the therapy and had minimal stimulation in the leg.On (b)(6)2018 the patient was seen with a complaint of acute urgency and frequency over the past several weeks.The patient denied pain or burning.The patient voids every 5min ¿ 45 minutes and does not feel he empties.The hcp examined the patient on (b)(6)2018 and reports the patient was doing well until one month ago.The patient had back and left leg pain which he felt was related to the device so multiple programs were changed and ultimately the device was turned off.The hcp reported the patient would like the device removed, which the hcp plans to do in the near future, approximately one week.The hcp discussed with the patient that it may be the spinal nerve, and he may need further evaluation.Patient was advised to go to the ed if pain is worse or if he gets lower extremity weakness.Medical history was also provided: patient has had enlarged prostate for about 6 years, gets up at night to urinate 3 times.Patient¿s current medications include trazodone.Bph (benign prostatic hyperplasia) without obstruction and incontinence diagnosed 2015, urge incontinence/frequency diagnosed 2016, frequency of micturition diagnosed (b)(6)2018, history of kidney stone upon examination the patient showed no outstanding issues: no fever, chills, denies chronic back pain, denies numbness or tingling.There were no further complications reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTERSTIM II
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, ELECTRICAL, IMPLANTABLE, FOR INCONTINENCE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7440595
MDR Text Key106251862
Report Number3004209178-2018-08324
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code EZW
UDI-Device Identifier00613994913654
UDI-Public00613994913654
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P970004
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,health professional
Reporter Occupation Patient Family Member or Friend
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/26/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/18/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/28/2016
Device Model Number3058
Device Catalogue Number3058
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/19/2018
Date Device Manufactured06/10/2015
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
-
-