• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY MITEK LLC US RIGIDFIX FEM 3.3MM S/T XPIN; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY MITEK LLC US RIGIDFIX FEM 3.3MM S/T XPIN; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 210133
Device Problems Break (1069); Separation Failure (2547)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.(b)(4).Associated medwatches: mr#1221934-2018-50497, mr#1221934-2018-50496, mr#1221934-2018-50499.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the theatre team ended up using 4 x sets of implants whilst using the rigidfix cross pin set.This is due to a couple of problems that the surgeon encountered: the small pins on the trocar would snap off while trying to drive the trocar/sleeve combination through the alignment jig and into the femur.On two instances, the sleeve ended up fusing to the trocar.On the 4th (and final) implant available, the surgeon made the decision to leave only one pin for fixation (rather than the recommended two pins) due to the problems encountered.In this instance, he said that the fixation still felt good and was confident that the implant would still perform.The whole incident added 30 minutes onto the procedure.All trocars and sleeves have been kept and decontaminated for inspection and can be returned at your request.The hospital have requested that x3 rigidfix cross pin implants be replaced free of charge as this was an incident that was out of their control.I notice that all x4 implants have different lot numbers which makes me question whether the actual alignment jig instrument is causing the problem and wonder if this also needs returning.Would it be possible to change this free of charge please? i have included the reference and of the instrument that was used in the incident and is still currently in use: description: rigidfix soft tissue guide frame.(b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint #(b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.Investigation summary
=
> the complaint device was discarded by the customer therefore, device is not available for a physical evaluation, however three sleeves were returned.Visually the devices are in good condition, no anomalies were discovered from these device components.Unknown if any of the returned sleeves were used.No device information was provided on the three returned sleeves.This complaint is not confirmed.No further information regarding the procedure or the device used has been provided to determine a root cause for the reported failure of jammed.The dhr review indicated that this batch of devices were processed without incident, therefore, there is no evidence of manufacturing anomalies on the records reviewed.Furthermore, a review into the depuy mitek complaints system revealed one other similar complaint for this lot of devices that were released to distribution.And at this time no corrective action is required and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.Udi(b)(4).Associated medwatches [mr#1221934-2018-50497] [mr#1221934-2018-50496] [mr#1221934-2018-50499].
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RIGIDFIX FEM 3.3MM S/T XPIN
Type of Device
SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY MITEK LLC US
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
MDR Report Key7450620
MDR Text Key106873234
Report Number1221934-2018-50498
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HTY
UDI-Device Identifier10886705000890
UDI-Public10886705000890
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K974341
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 04/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/23/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date10/31/2020
Device Catalogue Number210133
Device Lot NumberL642025
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/04/2018
Date Manufacturer Received06/04/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? Yes
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-