"providing goods that are substandard or defective" (b)(6) manufactures a defective thermometer resulting in inaccurate low readings.Internal review resulted in discontinuing distribution from the manufacturer.However (b)(6) has not voluntarily recalled the device or report the faulty device to the fda.(b)(6) has not removed the device from shelves or online.The price of the thermometer has been greatly reduced.In an attempt to quickly unload the inventory and turn a profit while they still can.In good faith i have followed the chain of command to allow (b)(6) to utilize the system of safe reporting and maintain a high level of integrity.Customer complaints are documented back 2 years before i got involved.I believe that the sale of a defective thermometer with low readings caused unnecessary pediatric admissions to the emergency department and unnecessary doctor visits.Cms payouts on uncontrolled fever claims, medication management discharged patients with otc prescription for tylenol filled at (b)(6) pharmacies is evident of a revolving door of patients and sales.Reducing the price to force these thermometers into use for pediatric patients is beyond deplorable, unethical and illegal.I believe after a review of the documentation (b)(6) is responsible to cover the cost the cms paid out in uncontrolled fever claims in relation to the amount of devices that were produced.Most importantly (b)(6) needs to follow the laws to safe reporting and pull the item from shelves and online marketplace.Diagnosis or reason for use: false low readings.(b)(6).
|