The surgeon reported that the patient had undergone a level 3 alif (l3-s1) surgery on (b)(6) 2018 with no complications.The patient had a 2nd surgery on (b)(6) 2018 to place pedicle screws at l4-l5 as planned.Both surgeries were performed as intended with no reported complications.It was reported by a camber sales rep that during a routine 6-week post-op appointment on (b)(6) 2018, patient x-rays of the operative levels indicated that the implant at l3-l4 had migrated from the original implant site.Revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2018.During this procedure, the surgeon confirmed the migration of the l3-l4 implant and extracted the device.This device was replaced with another implant.In addition, the surgeon verified the placement of the original l4-l5 and l5-s1 implants from the original level 2 alif and reported that implants were located in the correct positions (i.E., no other migration).The surgeon reported that the surgery was performed as intended with no complication.As a follow-up, the surgeon provided a statement documenting that he inspected the implant and believes that there are no structural defects.
|
It was reported by a camber sales rep that during a routine 6-week post-op appointment on (b)(6) 2018, a patient's x-rays indicated that the camber enza implant ((b)(6); l/n jp02017k) had migrated from the original position in the l3-l4 disc space.Revision surgery was performed on (b)(6) 2018, and the surgeon extracted the device.This implant was replaced with another device.
|