• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AV-TEMECULA-CT XIENCE SIERRA EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AV-TEMECULA-CT XIENCE SIERRA EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM; DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 1500350-28
Device Problems Positioning Failure (1158); Difficult to Remove (1528); Material Rupture (1546); Physical Resistance (2578); Material Deformation (2976)
Patient Problem Intimal Dissection (1333)
Event Date 04/04/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.Both the xience sierra stent and balloon were retrieved in the guiding catheter, and all the devices were removed as a single unit.A dissection occurred in the lad and was left untreated.Additionally, the target lesion will be treated in approximately 6 weeks.The patient was discharged the following day from the hospital.No additional information was provided.Guide wire: sion blue.The xience sierra is currently not commercially available in the u.S.; however, it is similar to a device sold in the u.S.The device was received.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow up report will be submitted with all relevant information.
 
Event Description
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a de novo lesion that was non-tortuous and heavily calcified located in the mid left anterior descending artery (lad) that was 90% stenosed.Pre-dilatation was performed in the first diagonal with a non-abbott balloon catheter at 10 atmospheres.A 3.0 x 23 mm xience sierra stent delivery system (sds) was advanced to the target lesion and successfully implanted in the first diagonal.Then the 3.0 x 23 mm sierra balloon was re-used for pre-dilatation in the mid lad.A 3.5 x 28 mm xience sierra sds could not cross the heavily calcified lad, and therefore a 7f guide liner was used with a non-abbott 2.5 x 20 mm balloon catheter for additional pre-dilatation.The 2.5 x 20 mm non-abbott balloon catheter was inflated to 16 atmospheres, but the xience sierra still could not cross the lesion.A 3.0 x 12 mm non-abbott balloon catheter was then selected and inflated to 14 atmospheres.The 3.5 x 28 mm xience sierra stent was advanced to the target lesion and during the first inflation at 8 atmospheres, the balloon ruptured and the stent partially deployed.A second unspecified wire was positioned to pull back the partially deployed stent and the balloon in the guideliner, but failed and the proximal edge of the stent became deformed.It was not possible to remove the guideliner from the sds, and a decision was made to cut the guideliner out of the sds.A non-abbott guide wire and a 2.5 x 20m mm non-abbott balloon catheter were advanced to the distal end of the partially deployed stent.The non-abbott balloon catheter was pulled back with the xience sierra stent and balloon.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).Internal file number - (b)(4).(b)(4).Evaluation summary: the device was returned for analysis.The reported material rupture was not confirmed; however, a tear in the outer member was observed.The reported material deformation was confirmed.The reported failure to deploy and difficulty to remove from the guide liner could not be tested due to the condition the device was returned.The reported difficulty to remove from the anatomy and physical resistance was unable to be replicated in a testing environment as they were based on operational circumstances.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported physical resistance appears to be related to circumstances of the procedure furthermore, the reported partial deployment, difficulty removing and material deformation appear to be related to the circumstances of the procedure as the device only partial deployed due to the noted outer member tear and interacted with the anatomy and guide catheter extension during removal resulting in the material deformation.The reported dissection is related to circumstances of the procedure.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XIENCE SIERRA EVEROLIMUS ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Type of Device
DRUG ELUTING CORONARY STENT SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
AV-TEMECULA-CT
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer (Section G)
CLONMEL, IRELAND REG# 9616693
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula CA 92591 4628
Manufacturer Contact
connie speck
abbott vascular
26531 ynez road
temecula, CA 92591-4628
9519143996
MDR Report Key7472906
MDR Text Key106898449
Report Number2024168-2018-03153
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NIQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
PMA/PMN Number
P110019
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Health Professional
Remedial Action Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 06/26/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/30/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/14/2021
Device Catalogue Number1500350-28
Device Lot Number8010641
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/19/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/13/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/01/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
-
-