• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. PENUMBRA SMART COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 400SMTHXSFT0102
Device Problem Mechanical Jam (2983)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 04/02/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.This report is associated with mfr report number: 3005168196-2018-00898.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure to treat a dural arteriovenous fistulas (d-avf) using penumbra smart coils (smart coils).During the procedure, the physician deployed and detached three smart coils in the peripheral branch of the occipital artery using a non-penumbra microcatheter.While attempting to advance a new smart coil into the microcatheter, the smart coil became stuck at the hub of the microcatheter; therefore, it was removed.The physician then attempted to advance another smart coil into the microcatheter; however, the smart coil also became stuck at hub of the microcatheter.Therefore, it was removed and the procedure was completed using a new smart coil, other coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Results: the pet lock was intact on the proximal end of the pusher assembly for the first smart coil evaluated.The pusher assembly was kinked approximately 136.5 cm from the proximal end.The embolization coil was intact with its pusher assembly.The smart coil pusher assembly could not be advanced through its introducer sheath.Therefore, the smart coil could not be functionally tested through a demonstration microcatheter.Conclusions: evaluation of the smart coil revealed that the pusher assembly could not be advanced through the introducer sheath.During the functional test, resistance was encountered as the kink in the pusher assembly was attempted to advance through its introducer sheath; however, the smart coil could not be advanced.The kink likely occurred due to forceful advancement against resistance.The root cause of the initial resistance could not be determined.Evaluation of the smart coil revealed that the embolization coil winds were offset.If the introducer sheath is not properly aligned within the hub of the microcatheter prior to advancement, damage such as offset coil winds may occur.During the functional test, resistance was experienced as the embolization coil entered the hub of the microcatheter and the coil began to take shape inside the hub.The smart coil could not be advanced any further.If the embolization coil winds become offset, it is likely they can contribute to the inability to advance the coil past the hub of the microcatheter during the procedure and functional testing.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PENUMBRA SMART COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7474053
MDR Text Key106969914
Report Number3005168196-2018-00897
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548015613
UDI-Public00814548015613
Combination Product (y/n)Y
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K160832
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor,foreign,health pr
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,04/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/30/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Expiration Date06/22/2022
Device Catalogue Number400SMTHXSFT0102
Device Lot NumberF77864
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/03/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received08/01/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/23/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-