• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ETHICON INC. PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ETHICON INC. PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT; MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC Back to Search Results
Device Problem Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
Patient Problems Pain (1994); Fibrosis (3167)
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).This report is related to a journal article, therefore no product will be returned for analysis and the batch history records cannot be reviewed as the lot number has not been provided.No specific patient information regarding events has been provided.If further details are received at the later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
 
Event Description
Title: chronic pain after tep inguinal hernia repair, does mri reveal a cause?.The study aimed to evaluate the role of mri in detecting causes of chronic pain following endoscopic hernia repair.A prospective cohort study was done between (b)(6) 2011 and (b)(6) 2012 comprising of 53 patients with chronic post-operative pain after total extraperitoneal (tep) hernia repair.Sixty seven groins out of 106 were operated; 14 patients had bilateral hernia repair.In 26 patients, a prolene mesh was used, in 14 patients ultrapro mesh, in 2 patients bard 3d mesh, in 2 patients physiomesh, in 1 patient a parietex mesh, and in 8 patients the type of mesh were unknown.Patients were untreated at the time of mri scanning and only used paracetamol in case of pain.Fibrosis was more often observed in painful operated groins than in unoperated groins.A trend towards significance was seen for the observation of fibrosis in painful groins.Moderate to extensive fibrosis was seen significantly more often when a prolene mesh had been used (in 13 of 26 patients) than after implantation of an ultrapro mesh (1 of 14 patients; p=0.02).Pain treatment included injections, implantation of a neuromodulating device, and physiotherapy.In patients with moderate to extensive fibrosis, pain diminished over time with or without treatment.In this study, mri in patients with post-tep hernia pain identified a correctly placed mesh, but it did not identify a specific cause for groin repair-related pain.Post-herniorrhaphy pain may be the result of different pathogenic mechanisms such as inflammatory response with concomitant fibrosis due to the presence of a mesh, mechanical irritation through the mesh and/or its fixation-device.Patients treated with a prolene mesh showed significantly more moderate to extensive fibrosis on mri compared to an ultrapro mesh, but numbers were small.It is generally agreed that meshes containing more material result in a more extensive inflammatory response resulting in more fibrosis.In conclusion, mri cannot be recommended to identify a specific cause for groin repair-related pain, but it does identify rare other causes of pain and to some extent does demonstrate the presence of (extensive) fibrosis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
PROLENE POLYPROPYLENE MESH UNKNOWN PRODUCT
Type of Device
MESH, SURGICAL, POLYMERIC
Manufacturer (Section D)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville NJ 08876 0151
Manufacturer (Section G)
ETHICON INC.
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville 08876 0151
Manufacturer Contact
darlene kyle
p.o. box 151, route 22 west
somerville, NJ 08876-0151
9082182792
MDR Report Key7498460
MDR Text Key107771985
Report Number2210968-2018-72672
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FTL
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K962530
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,literature
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/10/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/09/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received04/10/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-