(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.(b)(4).Evaluation summary: visual and functional inspection was performed on the returned device.The tip detachment was confirmed.It is likely that the tip separation was the result of failing to retract the thumbslide to the proximal position of the handle and locking in place with the system prior to removing.It should be noted that the supera instruction for use (ifu) instructs: following confirmed implantation of the supera stent, retract the thumb slide in a single motion to the starting position on the handle and rotate the system lock and deployment lock into the locked position, in line with the thumb slide.Failing to follow the removal instructions in the ifu likely contributed to the tip detachment.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities that would have contributed to this complaint.Additionally, a review of the complaint history of the reported lot revealed no other incidents.The investigation determined that the reported difficulties were likely user related.There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to the design, manufacture, or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was performed to treat a lesion in the right superficial femoral artery (sfa) with heavy calcification.The access was in the anterior tibial vessel in the right leg, and a 5.5 x 150 mm supera peripheral self-expanding stent was implanted in the sfa.When the stent system was retracted through the introducer sheath, the thumbslide was not in locked position, and therefore the tip was caught in the introducer sheath and became detached.The remainder of the ses was removed, but the separated tip was loose in the patient.A snare was used to retrieve the tip, ending the procedure.There was no clinically significant delay in the procedure.No additional information was provided.
|