BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MARLBOROUGH ENDOVIVE¿ SAFETY PEG KIT; TUBES, GASTROINTESTINAL (AND ACCESSORIES)
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M00566460 |
Device Problem
Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/07/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an endovive¿ safety peg kit pull method was used during an upper endoscopy with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, on (b)(6) 2018, the patient came back claiming the peg tube was hissing.They attempted to remove the tube however, it broke in half as if the internal bolster broke off inside the patient and the external bolster came out of the skin.Upper endoscopy was performed to retrieve the detached portion.The procedure was completed with a new endovive¿ safety peg kit pull method.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A visual examination of the returned device revealed that the internal bolster was detached from the tube, confirming the complaint.There appears to be residue on the distal end of the tube from the bolster-tube bond.The complaint was consistent with the reported incident that the bolster detached/separated.Operational factors likely contributed to the event, such as excessive force may be applied when removing the peg tube.Therefore, the most probable root cause of 'operational context' is selected for the complaint.The complaint investigation conclusion code selected is operational context, which indicates that the complaint is associated with a product that meets the design and manufacturing specifications but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance was limited.A dhr (device history record) review was performed and no deviation was found.A search of the complaint database confirmed that no similar complaints exist for the specified batch.A labeling review was performed and no anomalies were found.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an endovive safety peg kit pull method was used during an upper endoscopy with percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (peg) placement procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, on (b)(6) 2018, the patient came back claiming the peg tube was hissing.They attempted to remove the tube however, it broke in half as if the internal bolster broke off inside the patient and the external bolster came out of the skin.Upper endoscopy was performed to retrieve the detached portion.The procedure was completed with a new endovive safety peg kit pull method.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be fine.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|