Results: the pusher assembly was severely damaged.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned smart coil revealed that the pusher assembly was severely damaged.This damage likely occurred during packaging of the device for return to penumbra.Based on the returned condition of the device, the root cause of the reported kick back during detachment could not be determined.Evaluation of the returned handle revealed that the device was functional.The handle was functionally tested on the handle fixture for pull force and throw distance and passed for both within specification.The non-penumbra microcatheter and the smart coil embolization coil identified in the complaint were not returned for evaluation.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.Penumbra handles are 100% functionally tested during incoming inspection by quality.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure using penumbra smart coils (smart coils) and a smart coil detachment handle (handle).During the procedure, the physician successfully placed multiple coils and a smart coil using a non-penumbra microcatheter.The physician then advanced another smart coil into the target location, however, while attempting to detach the smart coil using the handle, the smart coil kicked back into the microcatheter.The smart coil unintentionally detached, and the physician then used the pusher assembly to push the smart coil into the target location.The physician then felt resistance and was unable to advance a guidewire past the last 1-2 cm from the tip of the microcatheter.The physician retracted the microcatheter out of the aneurysm, and then removed all of the devices.The procedure ended at this point.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|