Results: the embolization coil was detached via stretch resistant (sr) wire fracture and stretched.The proximal constraint sphere was present inside the distal detachment tip (ddt) with clotted blood visible.The distal tip of the embolization coil had minimal damage distal to a large stretched section of coil.Conclusions: evaluation of the returned podj revealed a detached embolization coil due to sr component fracture.This damage was likely a result of forcefully retracting the device against resistance.Based on the embolization coil stretching pattern, it is possible the distal tip of the embolization coil become stuck on the distal tip of the catheter when cycling.Further retracting the embolization coil after it is pinned may have caused the sr component to fracture.Significant thrombus attached to the ddt likely have contributed to the resistance experienced and the eventual sr component fracture.Evaluation of the returned lantern revealed an undamaged and functional device.A demonstration coil was advanced through its length without issue.Penumbra catheters and coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the lateral thoracic artery using a pod packing coil (podj) and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).During the procedure, while deploying a podj in the target vessel, the physician did not like the position of the podj and pulled it back into the lantern.The physician then pushed the podj again out of the lantern, but did not like its position and decided to pull it back into the lantern.While pulling the podj back into the lantern, the physician did not feel the "one to one" motion and upon pulling the podj pusher assembly further back, the podj unintentionally detached.Therefore, the physician removed the base catheter and the lantern containing the detached coil out of the patient¿s body.The procedure was completed using other coils and another microcatheter.It should be noted that there was no noted damage to the lantern after removal.The physician just wanted to start fresh with a new microcatheter.Additionally, there was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|