The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.The hospital discarded the device.
|
The patient was undergoing a thrombectomy procedure using a penumbra system ace 64 hi-flow kit (kit).During the procedure, the tip of the penumbra system ace 64 reperfusion catheter (ace64) broke off within the internal carotid artery of the patient after being advanced through a neuron max 6f 088 long sheath (neuron max).The physician, therefore, used a retrieval device to remove the tip of the ace64.The procedure was then completed using the same neuron max and a new catheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|