• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: DEPUY SPINE INC XPDM PEDICLE PROBE, STRAIGHT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

DEPUY SPINE INC XPDM PEDICLE PROBE, STRAIGHT Back to Search Results
Model Number 279702010
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problems Local Reaction (2035); Injury (2348); Blood Loss (2597); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Not Applicable (3189)
Event Date 01/01/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Device is available for evaluation.Investigation will be conducted.Follow up will be filed with the investigation results.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Event Description
Surgeon was using the straight, blunt pedicle probe to make a screw track and the probe broke off into the vertebral body of l5 on the left side.Patient consequence? yes.Patient consequence description: increased anesthesia time and blood loss.Part of the broken pedicle probe was retained in the patient.Surgeon had to extend the fusion 1 level, which was not planned.Is the information being submitted for this complaint all the details that are known/available regarding this event? yes.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product complaint # (b)(4).Visual examination at the macroscopic level reveal that the fracture was located approximately 17mm from the probe¿s distal tip.The second half of the probe¿s tip was not returned for analysis.Device was then sent for fracture analysis.The fracture analysis report reveals torsional shear markings following a circular pattern.This suggests that the fractured tip underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure.A review of the device history record was conducted.No issues were identified during the manufacturing and release of this product that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer.All complaint trends will be evaluated as a part of the depuy spine monthly complaint review meeting.A definitive root cause for the pedicle probe¿s distal tip fracturing cannot be positively determined.However, the fracture analysis suggests that the fractured tip underwent a quasi-static overload torsional shear failure.As there has been no issue identified in the manufacturing or release of the device that could have contributed to the problem reported by the customer and no systemic trends were found, this complaint file will be closed with no further action required.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
XPDM PEDICLE PROBE, STRAIGHT
Type of Device
PROBE
Manufacturer (Section D)
DEPUY SPINE INC
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer (Section G)
DEPUY SPINE INC
325 paramount drive
raynham MA 02767
Manufacturer Contact
jason busch
325 paramount drive
raynham, MA 02767
5088808100
MDR Report Key7553385
MDR Text Key109531671
Report Number1526439-2018-50500
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HXB
UDI-Device Identifier10705034198415
UDI-Public(01)10705034198415
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
EXEMPT
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 05/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/30/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number279702010
Device Catalogue Number279702010
Device Lot NumberNW196868
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer05/09/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received06/01/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/18/2017
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Unknown
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
-
-