• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: LDR MÉDICAL MOBI-C IMPLANT 13X15 H5 US; CERVICAL DISK PROSTHESIS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

LDR MÉDICAL MOBI-C IMPLANT 13X15 H5 US; CERVICAL DISK PROSTHESIS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problems Detachment Of Device Component (1104); Failure to Advance (2524)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/17/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
The review of the device history records did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.Based on the product history records and the recurrence of this type of event for this implant, the investigation found no evidence to indicate a device issue.The information initially provided ("the peek cartridge detached from the implant partially") & the event update provided after additional request attempts have been made ("the extraction forceps could not release the peek cartridge from the implant") are not consistent.From another information provided ("mobi-c would not advance or rotate to correct positioning"), the likely cause for the event is a mishandling when trying to reposition the device.It points out that the surgeon probably did not follow the instructions mentioned in the surgical techniques as indicated in st : "during and after insertion, avoid lateral and rotational movements of the implant-to-peek cartridge assembly." the investigation found no evidence to indicate device issue.Root cause : user error (instruction was not followed).Device not returned to manufacturer.
 
Event Description
Mobi-c p&f us : disassembly.From information provided, while mobi-c device was implanted, "peek cartridge detached from the implant partially, mobi-c would not advance or rotate to correct positioning." no delay of more than 30 min has been reported.The surgery was completed successfully with another implant of the same size.No impact on the patient.Additional information was received on may, 1st 2018 : according to reporter, the surgical technique was followed while loading implant on inserter.Reporter doesn't remember exactly the distraction amount, but he always requests the disc space to be distracted half way or less so there is slight resistance when advancing implant & using the mallet.He can't remember if a rotational movement was done while impacting device.There was no resistance problems, "just that the extraction forceps could not release the peek cartridge from the implant".Attempts have been made but no other information wasn't provided.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MOBI-C IMPLANT 13X15 H5 US
Type of Device
CERVICAL DISK PROSTHESIS
Manufacturer (Section D)
LDR MÉDICAL
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine 10300
FR  10300
Manufacturer (Section G)
LDR MÉDICAL
quartier europe de l¿ouest
5, rue de berlin
sainte-savine 10300
FR   10300
Manufacturer Contact
christina arnt
56 e. bell dr.
warsaw, IN 46582
5745273773
MDR Report Key7553622
MDR Text Key109582197
Report Number3004788213-2018-00174
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MJO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type distributor
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 05/30/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/30/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/01/2021
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue NumberMB3355
Device Lot Number5265457
Other Device ID NumberN/A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/17/2017
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured04/29/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Removal/Correction NumberN/A
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age42 YR
-
-