(b)(4).During processing of this complaint, attempts were made to obtain complete event, patient and device information.The device was returned for analysis.The reported material deformation (stent flare) was confirmed.The reported difficulty to position the device was unable to be tested due to the condition the device was returned.Additionally, torn material, a leak and material shredding was noted on the returned device.A review of the lot history record identified no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no other incidents from this lot.The investigation determined the reported difficulties appear to be related to circumstances of the procedure as it is likely the xience sierra device interacted with the other devices which were all within the guiding catheter, causing the reported difficulty to position and subsequent material deformation (stent flare).Additionally, this interaction likely resulted in the noted balloon damage (tear, leak, material shredding).There is no indication of a product quality issue with respect to manufacture, design or labeling of the device.
|
It was reported that the procedure was to treat a 90% stenosed, mildly tortuous, and heavily calcified concentric de novo lesion in the proximal circumflex artery.A 2.75x15mm xience sierra stent delivery system (sds) was being advanced; however, strong resistance was felt inside the guiding catheter.The sds was removed from the patient anatomy and the stent struts were noted to be flared.A different 2.75x15mm xience alpine stent was deployed to successfully complete the procedure.There was no reported adverse patient effect or a clinically significant delay in the procedure.Return device analysis revealed that the stent delivery system did not fully inflate as fluid leaked out of a tear and pinhole.Additionally, there was shredded/peeling material near the tear area.No additional information was provided.
|