Model Number N/A |
Device Problems
Inadequacy of Device Shape and/or Size (1583); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
|
Patient Problems
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 05/14/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product was not returned to manufacturer.Examination was not performed.The review of the traceability and the device history records did not reveal any non-conformances to specifications or deviations in procedures that might have contributed to the reported event.From information provided : the surgeon wants to put a cage avenue l 17 x 40 and finally put a 17x35.No fluoroscopy control for the test of the trial implant was performed by the surgeon , which explains the wrong size chosen.The review of the case indicate that the root cause of this event is an user error.Indeed as indicated in the surgical technique: "insert the chosen trial implant in the intervertebral space using the slotted mallet; make sure it is stable (slight compression) in between the vertebral bodies.Control under fluoroscopy: lateral view: depth, antero-posterior positioning and position in rotation - frontal view: centering, lateral coverage and position in rotation." investigation found no evidence of a product issue.Root cause is user error (surgeon didn't follow instruction for trial control).Device not returned to manufacturer.
|
|
Event Description
|
Avenue-l : ir6230p, wrong cage size.The surgeon wants to put a cage avenue l 17 x 40 and finally put a 17x35.No fluoroscopy control for the test of the trial implant was performed by the surgeon , which explains the wrong size chosen.The implant was discarded by the hospital.No impact on patient or on surgery (no delay superior to 30 min reported).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
D2 (common device name): avenue l lateral lumbar cage, avenue t tlif cage system, roi-a alif cage system, roi-t implant system.The cage was not returned for evaluation, so no results are available and no conclusions can be drawn.A review of the dhr did not find any issues which would have contributed to this event.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during surgery, the surgeon attempted to place an implant that was too large for the space.The initial implant was switched for a smaller size and the surgery was completed without further issues.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|