• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK FEMORAL-RM-LL-SZ 5; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MAKO SURGICAL CORP. MCK FEMORAL-RM-LL-SZ 5; PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 180515
Device Problem Malposition of Device (2616)
Patient Problem Pain (1994)
Event Date 08/01/2017
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Review of the product history records indicate that devices were manufactured and accepted into final stock with no reported discrepancies.There have been no other events for the lot referenced.It was noted that the device is not available for evaluation.If additional information is received, it will be provided in a supplemental report upon completion of the investigation.Not available.
 
Event Description
Patient called and stated that he had a bilateral mako plasty on (b)(6) 2012.Patient stated that on or about (b)(6) 2017 he started experiencing pain in his right knee.He went to (b)(6) and had x-rays and found out that he has a failed tibia.Event update per medical review "an ap x-ray taken on (b)(6) 2018 demonstrates lucency beneath the lateral aspect of the tibial component consistent with loosening.The femoral component is medially positioned in comparison to the location of the tibial implant.".
 
Event Description
Patient called and stated that he had a bilateral mako plasty on (b)(6) 2012.Patient stated that on or about august, 2017 he started experiencing pain in his right knee.He went to geisinger and had x-rays and found out that he has a failed tibia.Event update per medical review "an ap x-ray taken on (b)(6) 2018 demonstrates lucency beneath the lateral aspect of the tibial component consistent with loosening.The femoral component is medially positioned in comparison to the location of the tibial implant.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected lot number.An event regarding malposition involving a mako femoral component was reported.The event was not confirmed.Method & results: product evaluation and results: a material analysis was performed and concluded "the baseplate fractured in fatigue with the crack propagating from the distal to the proximal surface.Delamination, burnishing, scratching and third-body indentation were observed on the insert.These are common damage modes of uhmwpe.Damage was also observed on the insert consistent with the explantation process and contact against the baseplate eds showed that the baseplate was consistent with astm f136 alloy.Based on the given information, no identifiable materials or manufacturing discrepancies were observed on the surfaces examined." medical records received and evaluation: the provided medical records were reviewed by a consulting clinician indicated "review of these records confirms failure of fixation of the tibial component of a medial makoplasty ukr did occur.Abnormal articulation of the femoral/tibial components is seen on x-ray with the femoral component being medially positioned in comparison to the anatomic location of the tibial implant.It is likely the malpositioning of the femoral component lead to abnormal stresses across the articulation causing the tibial component failure.Material analysis failed to identify any material or manufacturing discrepancies.The root cause of the component loosening and mechanical failure appears to be clinical but cannot be determined definitively as insufficient information was available." product history review: device history review indicated the devices accepted into final stock from the reported lot were free from discrepancies.Complaint history review: there has been no other event for the lot referenced.Conclusions: the reported event was not confirmed nor the exact cause of the event could be determined based on the review of the medical records by the consulting clinician indicating "review of these records confirms failure of fixation of the tibial component of a medial makoplasty ukr did occur.Abnormal articulation of the femoral/tibial components is seen on x-ray with the femoral component being medially positioned in comparison to the anatomic location of the tibial implant.It is likely the malpositioning of the femoral component lead to abnormal stresses across the articulation causing the tibial component failure.Material analysis failed to identify any material or manufacturing discrepancies.The root cause of the component loosening and mechanical failure appears to be clinical but cannot be determined definitively as insufficient information was available." if additional information becomes available, this investigation will be reopened.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MCK FEMORAL-RM-LL-SZ 5
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, KNEE PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, PARTIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, CEMENTED, POLYM
Manufacturer (Section D)
MAKO SURGICAL CORP.
2555 davie road
fort lauderdale FL 33317
MDR Report Key7610518
MDR Text Key111374645
Report Number3005985723-2018-00371
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPJ
UDI-Device Identifier00848486000578
UDI-Public00848486000578
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
K090763
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/28/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/18/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date08/31/2016
Device Catalogue Number180515
Device Lot Number26370711
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer07/03/2018
Date Manufacturer Received08/31/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age56 YR
Patient Weight177
-
-