Model Number 801188 |
Device Problem
Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913)
|
Patient Problem
No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
|
Event Date 05/24/2018 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Per field service representative (fsr) the epgs was testing within the manufacturer's specifications but the user facility's perfusionist thought the discrepancy was too high and wanted to the unit replaced.The fsr replaced the epgs.The unit operated to the manufacturer's specifications.The suspect device was returned to the manufacturer for further evaluation.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during use of the device for a cardiopulmonary bypass (cpb) procedure, the electronic patient gas system (epgs) was reading 0.5 liters per minute (lpm) high.The surgical procedure was completed successfully.There was no delay, no blood loss, nor adverse consequences to the patient.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
During laboratory analysis, the product surveillance technician (pst) observed the flow readings to be within 0.02 liter per minute (l/min) of the set point as read with the central control monitor (ccm) and an external flowmeter.
|
|
Event Description
|
Per clinical review: during a cardiopulmonary bypass (cpb) procedure on (b)(6) 2018, the perfusionist on the case noticed that his sweep gas flow from the electronic patient gas system (epgs) was reading approximately.5 liters per minute (lpm) higher than expected.The perfusionist asked for the system to be looked at and exchanged with another epgs system, for his concern was that at 2.0 lpm a.5 difference was noticeable.The field service representative (fsr) tested the system and all specifications were within limits.It is not known if the perfusionist was concerned about the reading on the central control monitor (ccm) screen versus the set value of the gas flow, or if his concern was that the difference was between the reading on the ccm versus an external ball analog flow meter.The external ball meter did have an estimated flow, but the graduations between the liters of flow were at liters not milliliters.The epgs concern did not delay the continuation of the surgical procedure, and there was no harm or blood loss associated with the occurrence.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Per data log analysis on 27-jun-2018, the gas system did not detect any problem with flow being different than the set point.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported complaint was confirmed with information provided by the manufacturer's clinical specialist.The service repair technician (srt) was unable to duplicate the reported complaint.The unit operated to the manufacturer's specifications.If additional information becomes available on this complaint that would alter the facts and/or conclusion, a supplemental report will be filed accordingly.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|