• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAXTER HEALTHCARE - SINGAPORE HOMECHOICE PRO; SYSTEM, PERITONEAL, AUTOMATIC DELIVERY

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAXTER HEALTHCARE - SINGAPORE HOMECHOICE PRO; SYSTEM, PERITONEAL, AUTOMATIC DELIVERY Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 5C8310
Device Problems Grounding Malfunction (1271); Device Emits Odor (1425)
Patient Problems No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199); Electric Shock (2554)
Event Date 06/04/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a home patient (hp) experienced electric shock from the homechoice during peritoneal dialysis therapy.The hp was connected.The hp stated that for the last few months, had felt through something was going through the body like was being shocked and it was concentrated around the neck area.The hp also stated that the caregiver (cg) noticed that the cord on the ground where it plugs into the large extension cord was burning the carpet.Hp stated about feeling warmer than usual in the past, especially around the neck, but the feeling of electric shock really only happened last night and the damage to the carpet was done the night before.Hp mentioned that the homechoice does smell like burning metal.Renal therapy services (rts) agent advised the hp to inform the registered nurse about the incident and missed therapy.Rts initiated a swap and discussed continuous peritoneal ambulatory peritoneal dialysis.Seven days after the event, it was confirmed that the patient was not cleaning the device when electric shock was felt.The patient was asked how he usually cleaned the device to check for use error.The patient stated that semi-moist paper cloths are used, and alcohol use was excluded.The patient confirmed to be wearing footwear (indoor slippers) and no woolly attire during pd therapy.A 3-prong-plug was used with the device, with one of the pins (possibly the earth pin, according to the patient) described to be ¿completely destroyed¿.The electrical extension cord was 10 feet long.The burning issue involving the electrical cord and the carpet had been noticed by the patient¿s wife on previous occasions.The patient admitted to have ignored the wife.The patient¿s house was described to be adequately grounded.At the time of the event, there was no excessive cold temperatures necessitating the use of house-warming devices.The patient described the reaction to the electrical event as ¿warmth in the body concentrating at the back of the neck; the nape felt extra warm and scratchy¿.No visible burns were sustained and the patient did not seek medical assistance.The neck irritation was still present at the time of this report.There was no patient injury and no medical intervention reported at the time of the event.No additional information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection was performed with naked eye with no issues noted.The homechoice device received a returned instrument testing evaluation (rite).This evaluation included functional and electrical testing of the device.The device was determined to meet functional and electrical performance specification requirements per rite testing.All voltages were within specifications.The sample analysis was performed and there was no device malfunction found that could have caused or contributed to the reported problems.A service history review revealed no indication that the parts replaced during servicing caused or contributed to the reported event.This type of event would not be noted in the event history log.The reported problem was not verified.Should additional relevant information become available, a supplemental report will be submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
HOMECHOICE PRO
Type of Device
SYSTEM, PERITONEAL, AUTOMATIC DELIVERY
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAXTER HEALTHCARE - SINGAPORE
singapore
Manufacturer (Section G)
BAXTER HEALTHCARE - SINGAPORE
2 woodlands industrial park d
singapore 73875 0
SN   738750
Manufacturer Contact
25212 w. illinois route 120
round lake, IL 60073
2242702068
MDR Report Key7639558
MDR Text Key112452336
Report Number1416980-2018-03891
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FKX
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K102936
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,consum
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/26/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Catalogue Number5C8310
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer06/12/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/30/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage N
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age71 YR
-
-