This supplemental report is being submitted to provide the device evaluation findings, to provide the device code and to update sections.The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.The customer¿s complaint of intermittent function was confirmed.A visual inspection was performed on the received device and found that the device jaws were open and in the ¿latch on¿ position.The jaw aperture was found to be in specification and measured at approx.0.283 inches.The jaw mesh appeared abnormal as that jaws were bent towards the tip and the teeth do not mesh in the back.The heat shrink was found split near the bend in the leg and bare metal was exposed.It appears no material is missing.No further physical damage noted during physical inspection.The latch operates as intended, jaws rotate and the blade extends and retracts smoothly.Dome switches actuate when pressed from various locations.During functional testing, the g400 generator recognizes the device as halo and sets default settings appropriately (vp3/35).Testing was complete on a range of beef tissue thicknesses.On full-bite, thick tissue samples, the device functioned as intended.Several regrasp errors were observed when testing on thin beef tissue.Due to the thickness of this tissue it is possible that the jaw teeth came in contact with one another, shorting the connection and therefore the regrasp error was warranted and was triggered as designed.Teeth are more likely to break through when the jaws are bent and additional pressure is being placed on the already thin tissue.Based on the device evaluation, it is likely the bent jaws caused by pressure led to the regrasp errors occurring at a greater frequency than expected on thin tissue.The instruction manual wars users" do not activate the device while adjacent to or in contact with other metallic objects or devices.Unintended tissue injury and/or damage to the contacted object or device may occur.".
|