• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BAYER PHARMA AG ESSURE; TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE Back to Search Results
Model Number ESS305
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Fragmentation (1261); Migration or Expulsion of Device (1395); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Migration (4003)
Patient Problems Failure of Implant (1924); Discomfort (2330); Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
Event Date 01/01/2011
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
This spontaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of embedded device ("coils expelled and embedded"), device breakage ("coils broke during removal procedure") and device expulsion ("coils expelled and embedded") in a female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.In 2009, the patient had essure inserted.In 2011, the patient experienced device breakage (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required) and complication of device removal ("she has fragments inside her").On an unknown date, the patient experienced embedded device (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), device expulsion (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required) and malaise ("sicker").The patient was treated with surgery (hysterectomy in 2011) and surgery (total hysterectomy scheduled).Essure was removed.At the time of the report, the embedded device, device breakage, device expulsion and complication of device removal outcome was unknown and the malaise had not resolved.The reporter considered complication of device removal, device breakage, device expulsion, embedded device and malaise to be related to essure.The reporter commented: consumer stated that coils broke inside her during removal procedure.She has fragments insider her (total hysterectomy was scheduled).Incident no lot n:umber or sample available for investigation.There is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Ntaneous case was reported by a lawyer and describes the occurrence of embedded device ("coils expelled and embedded"), device breakage ("coils broke during removal procedure") and device expulsion ("coils expelled and embedded") in a female patient who had essure inserted.The occurrence of additional non-serious events is detailed below.In 2009, the patient had essure inserted.In 2011, the patient experienced device breakage (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required) and complication of device removal ("she has fragments inside her").On an unknown date, the patient experienced embedded device (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required), device expulsion (seriousness criteria medically significant and intervention required) and malaise ("sicker").The patient was treated with surgery (hysterectomy in 2011) and surgery (total hysterectomy scheduled).Essure was removed.At the time of the report, the embedded device, device breakage, device expulsion and complication of device removal outcome was unknown and the malaise had not resolved.The reporter considered complication of device removal, device breakage, device expulsion, embedded device and malaise to be related to essure.The reporter commented: consumer stated that coils broke inside her during removal procedure.She has fragments insider her (total hysterectomy was scheduled).Quality-safety evaluation of ptc: unable to confirm complaint.Most recent follow-up information incorporated above includes: on 30-oct-2018: quality safety evaluation of ptc.Incident: no lot number or sample available for investigation.There is no evidence that a device-related defect or malfunction caused a death or serious injury.If additional information becomes available it will be provided on a supplemental report.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ESSURE
Type of Device
TRANSCERVICAL CONTRACEPTIVE TUBAL OCCLUSION DEVICE
Manufacturer (Section D)
BAYER PHARMA AG
müllerstr. 178
berlin, 13353
GM  13353
MDR Report Key7642249
MDR Text Key112486419
Report Number2951250-2018-02856
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HHS
Combination Product (y/n)N
PMA/PMN Number
P020014
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer,other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/30/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/27/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberESS305
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/30/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-