• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC. MAXI SKY 600; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC. MAXI SKY 600; LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED Back to Search Results
Model Number LD10000
Device Problem Defective Component (2292)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/06/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
(b)(4).The customer was visited by (b)(6) representative.It was established that the liquid observed by the customer was caused by the (b)(4) years old battery.Additional information will be provided upon conclusions of the investigation.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2018 (b)(6) was informed about the incident, which occurred at the customer's home in the (b)(6).The customer reported that a liquid leaked from the maxi sky 600 ceiling lift.The liquid fell on the customer's staff causing a hole in the service user t-shirt and damaged two tv remote controls.No injury was reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
On 06-jun-2018 arjo was informed about the incident, which occurred at the customer's home in the uk.The customer reported the leak (yellow-orange color spillage) from the maxi sky 600 ceiling lift and decided to call arjo.The arjo technician visited the customer on (b)(6) 2018 and performed an inspection of the claimed device.During the evaluation, it was confirmed that the leak comes from the lead-acid battery.When repairing the device, the liquid burnt a hole in the service user t-shirt and damaged two tv remote controls.No injury was reported.The technician replaced the battery and returned this component for the further evaluation.The claimed lift was under the arjo service and maintenance contract.The last service of this device was performed on 25-jan-2016.The evaluation of the returned battery showed that this component was manufactured on 06-sep-2010.Based on the serviced history conducted by the arjo representative, it could be determined that the battery was not the originally fitted one and it was replaced during repair of the device on (b)(6) 2010.It indicates that the battery was almost 8 years in use.The new battery used during repair of the lift is a type of non-spillable.This type of battery makes the possibility for a liquid spill to be much lower than with the lead-acid battery.Additionally, the returned battery was tested by the sales and service unit representative.The battery liquid evaluation was performed using the ph paper.The results showed that the ph of the battery liquid was 2 (acid).Based on the clinical expert opinion, this ph cannot cause any serious injury.In the worst case scenario it may result in the skin irritation if the liquid would be left for a long time.When reviewing similar reportable events registered in the last 5 years, we have not found any similar complaint related to the investigated issue.According to that, this particular complaint appears to be an isolated one.Sum up, while the incident occurred the device was being used for the patient's handling.The leak was caused by the defective battery, which was in use for almost 8 years.The device was not according to the manufacturer's specification and the repair of the device was needed.The complaint decided to be reportable as the user has been exposed to the battery acids.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MAXI SKY 600
Type of Device
LIFT, PATIENT, NON-AC-POWERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
ARJOHUNTLEIGH MAGOG INC.
2001 tanguay street
magog, J1X5Y 5
CA  J1X5Y5
MDR Report Key7644856
MDR Text Key112859725
Report Number9681684-2018-00054
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code FSA
Combination Product (y/n)N
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,user f
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/25/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/28/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Other Caregivers
Device Model NumberLD10000
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA07/25/2018
Distributor Facility Aware Date06/06/2018
Device Age9 YR
Event Location Home
Date Report to Manufacturer07/25/2018
Date Manufacturer Received06/06/2018
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Weight87
-
-