• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION Back to Search Results
Model Number NEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Bacterial Infection (1735); Erosion (1750)
Event Date 05/24/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of the article as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.Section d information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown, ubd: , udi#: canaz, h., karalok, i., topcular, b., agaoglu, m., yapici, z., aydin, s.Dbs in pediatric patients: institutional experience.Childs nerv syst.2018.Doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-3839-1.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.(b)(4).
 
Event Description
Summary: introduction dbs is initially used for treatment of essential tremor and parkinson¿s disease in adults.In 1996, a child with severe life-threatening dystonia was offered dbs to the internal globus pallidus (gpi) with lasting efficacy at 20 years.Since that time, increasing number of children benefited from dbs.Patients and methods we retrospectively evaluated our database of patients who underwent dbs from 2011 to 2017.All patients = 17 years of age at the time of implantation of dbs were included in this series.Subjective benefit rating scale (sbrs), hoehn yahr scale (hys), fahn marsden rating scale (fmrs), clinical global impressions scales (cgi), and yale global tic severity scale (ygt) were used to evaluate clinical outcome.Results between may 2014 and october 2017, 11 children underwent dbs procedure in our institution.Six of them were female and five of them were male.Mean age at surgery was 11.8 ± 4.06 years (range 5¿17 years).In our series, four patients had primary dystonia (pdy) (36.3%), three patients had secondary dystonia (sdy) (27.2%), two patients had jp (18.1%), and two patients had tourette syndrome (ts) (18.1%).Two jp patients under went bilateral stn dbs while the other nine patients underwent bilateral gpi dbs.Sbrs scores were 1.75 ± 0.5 for patients with pdy, 3 ± 0 for patients with jp, 2.5 ± 0.7 for patients with ts, and 2 ± 1 for patients with sdy.Mean fmrs reduction rate was 40.5 for patients with dystonia.Significant improvement was also defined in patients with ts and jp after dbs.None of the patients experienced any intracerebral hemorrhage or other serious adverse neurological effect related to the dbs.Wound complications occurred in two patients.Conclusion there are many literatures that support dbs as a treatment option for pediatric patients with medically refractory neurological disorders.Dbs has replaced ablative procedures as a treatment of choice not only for adult patients, but also for pediatric patients.Wound-related complications still remain the most common problem in pediatric patients.Development of smaller and more flexible hardware will improve quality of children¿s life and minimize wound-related complications in the future.Reported events: patient 8: a (b)(6)-year-old male patient with bilateral globus pallidusinternus (gpi) deep brain stimulation (dbs) for tourette syndrome experienced ¿head skin¿ erosion over the connection point of the leads.Related to this it was noted that the patient experienced t witching due to their ts.Infection was diagnosed so the system was totally removed.Escherichia coli was cultured.The dbs system was ultimately reinserted after antibiotic therapy was completed.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NEUROMODULATION
800 53rd ave ne
minneapolis MN 55421 1200
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7657453
MDR Text Key112992422
Report Number3007566237-2018-01956
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MFR
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeTU
PMA/PMN Number
H050003
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type foreign,health professional,l
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/02/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/02/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Catalogue NumberNEU_INS_STIMULATOR
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/05/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age9 YR
-
-