• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY2C0520
Device Problems Failure to Fold (1255); Kinked (1339)
Patient Problem No Consequences Or Impact To Patient (2199)
Event Date 06/04/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.This report is associated with mfr report numbers: 3005168196-2018-01307; 3005168196-2018-01308; 3005168196-2018-01310; 3005168196-2018-01311; 3005168196-2018-01312.The hospital discarded the device.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the accessory renal artery and the inferior mesenteric artery (ima) using ruby coils and a pod6.During the procedure, the physician successfully placed the initial two coils in the accessory renal artery using a non-penumbra artery.While attempting to advance a ruby coil through the microcatheter, the hospital technologist experienced resistance and bent the ruby coil pusher assembly twice; therefore, it was removed.While attempting to place a new ruby coil in the ima, the ruby coil would not take its intended shape; therefore, it was removed.While attempting to re-sheath the ruby coil, the hospital technologist pulled the ruby coil passed the friction lock and the embolization coil was coming out of the proximal end of the introducer sheath.The physician then advanced a new ruby coil in the ima; however, the ruby coil did not take its intended shape and therefore, was removed.It was reported the ruby coil pusher assembly was kinked.Next, the physician advanced two other ruby coils in the ima, but the ruby coils did not take their intended shape; therefore, they were removed.While advancing a pod6 into the ima, there was some tension and the microcatheter and guide catheter came out the ima and into the aorta.It was reported that approximately 30 centimeters of the pod6 was still in the microcatheter and could not be advanced into the ima.Subsequently, the pod6 unintentionally detached.Therefore, the physician used a snare device to push the remaining pod6 out of the microcatheter and guide catheter, and removed the microcatheter and guide catheter from the patient¿s body.The physician then used the snare device to remove the detached pod6 from the patient¿s body.The physician then decided to stop the procedure after removal of the pod6 and did not treat the ima.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key7659414
MDR Text Key113388934
Report Number3005168196-2018-01309
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548012902
UDI-Public00814548012902
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K120330
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,health
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 06/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/03/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Physician
Device Catalogue NumberRBY2C0520
Device Lot NumberF73592
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/04/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/09/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age63 YR
-
-