BOSTON SCIENTIFIC - MARLBOROUGH UPHOLD¿ LITE; MESH, SURGICAL, SYNTHETIC, UROGYNECOLOGIC, FOR PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE, TRANSVAGIN
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number M0068318170 |
Device Problem
Detachment Of Device Component (1104)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 06/07/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
(b)(4).The device has been received for analysis.Upon completion of the failure analysis of the complaint device, if there is any further relevant information from that review, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold lite with capio slim was used during an enterocele repair procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, upon passing the device through the insertion site without applying force, the suture broke in half.The procedure was completed with another uphold lite with capio slim.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported to boston scientific corporation that an uphold lite with capio slim was used during an enterocele repair procedure performed on (b)(6) 2018.According to the complainant, during the procedure, upon passing the device through the insertion site without applying force, the suture broke in half.The procedure was completed with another uphold lite with capio slim.There were no patient complications reported as a result of this event.The patient's condition at the conclusion of the procedure was reported to be stable.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A visual analysis of the returned device revealed that the suture on the blue with white stripe dilator was broken, confirming the event.In addition, the remainder of the suture including the dart and the capio slim capturing device were not returned.A review of the device history record (dhr) indicated that the device met all material, assembly, and product specifications at the time of release to distribution.The investigation concluded that this complaint is associated with a product that meets the design and manufacture specifications but due to anatomical/procedural factors encountered during the procedure, performance of the device was limited.The most probable root cause classification is operational context.A labeling review was performed and, from the information available, this device was used per the directions for use (dfu)/product label.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|