• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO SURESCAN; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF Back to Search Results
Model Number 97702
Device Problems Intermittent Continuity (1121); Therapy Delivered to Incorrect Body Area (1508); Device Operates Differently Than Expected (2913); Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
Patient Problems Undesired Nerve Stimulation (1980); Pain (1994); Therapeutic Effects, Unexpected (2099); Discomfort (2330); Complaint, Ill-Defined (2331); Ambulation Difficulties (2544)
Event Date 10/16/2014
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a patient with an implantable neurostimulator (ins) for the treatment of non-malignant pain.It was reported that the patient couldn¿t get their device to stop the pain and they were really hurting.The patient stated that they could only sit in a recliner.The patient reported that when they lean back, ¿the power shoots up¿ and they have to get out of the recliner due to the ¿vibrating.¿ the patient was walked through switching to group a.The patient only had one program on group a and they set the stimulation to 6.0 v, but they were still having pain.The patient intended to follow up with their hcp if they did not receive pain relief.No further complications are anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.It was reported that the ins doesn¿t do any good.The patient wanted to know if she can shut the ins off in the meantime.The patient explained the ins was not doing any good because the pain is in a completely different spot.The patient said the pain got really bad in about the last 3 months.It was reviewed that the patient needed to coordinate with the healthcare provider (hcp) to turn the ins due to the patient losing their programmer.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the patient.It wasreported that a manufacturer representative tried to work with the ins to resolve the power increasing when leaning back, but it made no difference.The cause of the issue was unknown and the issue was unresolved at the time of the report.No further complications are anticipated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The patient clarified that the issue of the stimulation going full blast when leaning back started when they were implanted on (b)(6) 2014.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the patient.It was reported that their stimulation went "full blast" when they sat and leaned back.They needed to do this more because of a leg problem (which was unrelated to their device/therapy) and every time they leaned back the stimulation was too strong.No further complications reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the patient reported that recently they met with a manufacturer representative and they helped adjust their stimulation, because it was not in the right spot.The patient stated that since then they had lost their patient programmer and they needed to turn the ins off because it was bothering them, because it was still not in the right spot.It was reported that the event occurred about a week prior to (b)(6) 2018.It was further reported on (b)(6) 2018 that the patient was having a hard time moving around.The patient stated that they were ¿kind of crippled up.¿ no further complications were reported or anticipated.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SURESCAN
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR PAIN RELIEF
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC MED REL MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
lisa woodward clark
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
7635263920
MDR Report Key7664005
MDR Text Key113253522
Report Number3004209178-2018-15054
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169109513
UDI-Public00643169109513
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type consumer
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/04/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/05/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/28/2015
Device Model Number97702
Device Catalogue Number97702
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/08/2018
Date Device Manufactured10/11/2013
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age75 YR
-
-