• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION AORTIC FLEX; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION AORTIC FLEX; HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL Back to Search Results
Model Number 500FA19
Device Problems Unintended System Motion (1430); Structural Problem (2506); Unintended Movement (3026)
Patient Problems Host-Tissue Reaction (1297); Corneal Pannus (1447); Failure of Implant (1924)
Event Date 06/19/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately 20 years post implant of this 19mm mechanical valve, the valve was explanted and replaced with a non-medtronic 23mm mechanical valve.The valve was explanted due to improper leaflet motion caused by subvalvular pannus formation.No additional adverse patient effects were reported. .
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, visual inspection revealed the valve was returned with both leaflets intact and in the closed position with no evidence of damage.Both inflow and outflow valve hinge mechanisms were intact.The inflow and outflow orifices were intact with no evidence of damage.Tan glistening pannus was covering the sewing ring on the inflow and outflow extending slightly over the inflow and outflow orifice.An unknown amount of pannus appears to have been removed on the inflow and outflow during explant.Radiologic evaluation revealed no calcification on the leaflets.Conclusion: reduced performance of the valve is attributed to host tissue overgrowth.This finding is generally considered a patient -related condition.Additional information was received that this mechanical valve was replaced after 20 years and 3 months.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added expiration date.Added device manufacture date.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AORTIC FLEX
Type of Device
HEART-VALVE, MECHANICAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
paula bixby
8200 coral sea street ne
mounds view, MN 55112
7635055378
MDR Report Key7683114
MDR Text Key113821732
Report Number2025587-2018-01743
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWQ
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P990046
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,distri
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/03/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/12/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/03/2002
Device Model Number500FA19
Device Catalogue Number500FA19
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/03/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/08/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured09/03/1997
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age45 YR
Patient Weight42
-
-