• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER, SEPTAL OCCLUDER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE® CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER; TRANSCATHETER, SEPTAL OCCLUDER Back to Search Results
Catalog Number GSX0025A
Device Problems Entrapment of Device (1212); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923); Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problems Death (1802); Embolus (1830); Occlusion (1984); Obstruction/Occlusion (2422)
Event Date 07/05/2018
Event Type  Death  
Event Description
It was reported the physician selected a 25mm gore® cardioform septal occluder to close an atrial septal defect balloon sized to 13mm.It was further reported that the device was deployed and repositioned one time prior to lock release.Following lock release, it was reported, device placement was interrogated with transesophageal echocardiography.According to the report, there appeared to be a prolapse of the device on the inferior rim and a decision was made to snare the device.It was further reported that during attempted device retrieval, the occluder prolapsed into the left atrium and embolized to the ascending aorta where it obstructed blood flow.It was reported the patient was placed on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and expired.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Age at time of event is (b)(6).Initially reported as (b)(6).Below is a summary of the findings from the review of electronic files containing digital fluoroscopy and transesophageal echocardiography (tee) that were provided to gore: fluoroscopic imaging made available to gore shows the gore® cardioform septal occluder in its deployed state prior to locking, in both the anterior posterior (ap) and lateral projections.The deployed device in the ap view cannot be assessed due to the tee probe obstructing the view.The lateral view shows two equally sized discs with a separation between the left and right disc indicating appropriate formation of the occluder.Further detailed examination of the deployed occluder in the lateral view cannot confirm whether the entire right disc is on the right side of the septum.Additionally, it is difficult to confirm whether the entire right disc is on the right side of the septum in the fluoroscopic images provided following lock release.Additional fluoroscopic imaging shows the embolized device in the ascending aorta.An angiogram is performed, and the device is shown obstructing flow to the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries.Further imaging depicts an angiogram with the device removed and restored perfusion to the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries.Transesophageal echocardiographic imaging shows static defect measurements of 9.2 mm in the bicaval view and 12.9 mm in the aortic short axis view.The defect rim measurements are shown as follows: the inferior rim is 14.1 mm, the superior rim is 6.3 mm, and the posterior rim is 12.4 mm.Stop flow balloon sizing is performed and the measurements are recorded as 11.8 mm in the bicaval view and 12.5 mm in the aortic short axis view.Additional transesophageal echocardiographic imaging depicts the assessment of the device stability in the septum.Assessment of the device rims shows no shunting around the device.The delivery catheter is observed in these images, so it is assumed the device has not been released.In additional imaging, the catheter is not observed and it is assumed the device has been released.These images show the device mobile from the septum, and the right disc on the left atrial side on the inferior aspect of the device.The last image depicts the device embolized from the septum and mobile in the mitral valve.Thus, the review of the images provided could not determine a reason for the device embolization; however, the images do confirm the device embolized to the ascending aorta and obstructed blood flow to the brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries.With regard to a review of manufacturing records associated with this device, the review verified the lot was processed normally and all pre-release specifications were met.In order to mitigate the risk of device embolization, the design of the gore® cardioform septal occluder has several features including the following: platinum-filled nitinol frame engineered for enhanced fluoroscopic and echogenic visibility to allow for the physician to thoroughly assess device positioning during the procedure.The physician has the ability to evaluate the device prior to locking it and may reposition the device by loading it back into the catheter and re-deploying it if necessary.Once the device is deployed and locked the physician can continue to assess the position of the device.If needed, there is still the ability to retrieve it safely.Engineered with a retrieval cord and delivery catheter that allow for the device to be pulled back into the delivery catheter and removed.Additionally, to mitigate the risk of device embolization the gore® cardioform septal occluder instructions for use (ifu) states: the gore® cardioform septal occluder should be used only in conjunction with appropriate imaging techniques to assess the septal anatomy and to visualize the wire frame.Also, to mitigate the risk of device embolization, the ifu additionally addresses device sizing: ¿the defect and atrial chamber size should be evaluated by transesophageal or intracardiac echo with color flow doppler measurement to confirm that there is adequate space to accommodate the selected occluder size without impinging on adjacent cardiac structures (e.G., a-v valves, ostia of the pulmonary veins, coronary sinus, or other critical features).¿ ¿there must be adequate room in the atrial chambers to allow the right and left atrial discs to lie flat against the septum with disc spacing equal to the septal thickness, and without interference with critical cardiac structures or the free wall of the atria.¿ ¿an occluder that pulls through the defect after disc conformation may be too small and should be removed and replaced with a larger size.¿ additionally, a complete section is included in the ifu providing recommended procedures for sizing the defect and selecting the appropriate occluder detailing the imaging required, the need for utilizing stop flow balloon sizing techniques, how to measure the defect size, and the minimum occlude to defect size ratio recommended based upon this information.The ifu lists device embolization as a potential device or procedure-related adverse event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The user facility report (number (b)(4)) was forwarded to gore.This report noted an event date of (b)(6) 2018, which may be the date of death as the case images confirm the procedure date as (b)(6) 2018.The event description provided corresponds with the original report.There is no other new or missing information in the report.Below are the user facility codes and gore's response to whether the type of event represented by the code is addressed in the device labeling.(b)(4).The gore® cardioform septal occluder instructions for use list embolization and death as potential device or procedure related adverse events.(b)(4).The gore® cardioform septal occluder instructions for use address device sizing which covers positioning and device stability ((b)(4)).The instructions for use state: ¿ ¿the defect and atrial chamber size should be evaluated by transesophageal or intracardiac echo with color flow doppler measurement to confirm that there is adequate space to accommodate the selected occluder size without impinging on adjacent cardiac structures (e.G., a-v valves, ostia of the pulmonary veins, coronary sinus, or other critical features).¿ ¿ ¿there must be adequate room in the atrial chambers to allow the right and left atrial discs to lie flat against the septum with disc spacing equal to the septal thickness, and without interference with critical cardiac structures or the free wall of the atria.¿ ¿ ¿an occluder that pulls through the defect after disc conformation may be too small and should be removed and replaced with a larger size.¿ additionally, a complete section is included in the ifu providing recommended procedures for sizing the defect and selecting the appropriate occluder detailing the imaging required, the need for utilizing stop flow balloon sizing techniques, how to measure the defect size, and the minimum occlude to defect size ratio recommended based upon this information.It is unclear how device problem code relates to the reported event; however, the gore® cardioform septal occluder instructions for use address device advancement as follows: ¿ the occluder is delivered using conventional catheter delivery techniques and may be delivered with the aid of a 0.035" guidewire (or smaller), if desired.¿ the gore® cardioform septal occluder should only be used in patients whose vasculature is adequate to accommodate a 10 fr delivery sheath (or 12 fr delivery sheath when a guidewire is used).Additionally, the ifu notes the device is contraindicated for use with anatomy where the gore® cardioform septal occluder size or position would interfere with other intracardiac or intravascular structures, such as cardiac valves or pulmonary veins.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Added unique identifier (udi) #.Added an explant date of (b)(6) 2018, according to reviewed case images.Noted the initial reporter also sent report to the fda.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE® CARDIOFORM SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Type of Device
TRANSCATHETER, SEPTAL OCCLUDER
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
KENDRICK PEAK MPD B/P
4250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
marci stewart
1500 n. 4th street
flagstaff, AZ 
9285263030
MDR Report Key7719000
MDR Text Key114998122
Report Number2017233-2018-00449
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code MLV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P050006
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/07/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/25/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date02/12/2020
Device Catalogue NumberGSX0025A
Device Lot Number17768408
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured02/12/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death;
Patient Age5 YR
Patient Weight17
-
-