Agilent inspected the device and investigated the reported issue.Customer is currently using masshunter quantitative analysis, (b)(4), and is using the compound table in single sample display mode.Based on agilent's investigation, the following are confirmed to be the root causes: customer workflow: customer is using a workflow not recommended by agilent.Agilent's recommended workflow is documented in the learning product literature which shipped with the customer instrument.Training materials: incorrect referral of batch table as a 'report' instead of 'result'.Technical defect: in using compound table view, in batch at a glance, when a user cycles through a list of samples, the expected result is that the sample name shown in the drop-down menu will match the sample header column in the compound table.However, in masshunter quantitative analysis, (b)(4), a defect occurs when a new sample(s) is inserted.This defect creates a mismatch between the sample name and the column header whereby the sample header will be offset by one sample.This defect only manifests after the new sample is inserted in the list and when the entire sample list is cycled through.
|
It was reported that the customer is using batch table in compound table view mode for data review and printing of patient data.Under certain conditions, the customer has observed cases where in moving from one sample to another the data in the table would change but the sample/patient name in the compound results column header would not update to the current sample/patient name.This issue caused the customer to release data on two different patients with incorrect results.Incorrect results were identified by the physicians.Customer was notified and has sent the physicians the corrected results.In conclusion, there is no adverse event due to the reported issue based on the available information.
|