The product was not returned for evaluation.Without the return of the device, the root cause of the problem cannot be determined.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
|
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the mesenteric artery using ruby coils.It was noted that the patient's anatomy was somewhat tortuous.During the procedure, while attempting to advance a ruby coil through a non-penumbra microcatheter, the physician experienced resistance; therefore, the physician decided to remove it.However, while re-sheathing the ruby coil, it unintentionally detached inside the microcatheter.Therefore, the physician removed the microcatheter containing the detached coil and the coil was removed.The procedure was completed using the same microcatheter and other coils.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
|