The retained pin fragment was not removed from the patient.The partial fragment, which was not implanted, was returned.Orthalign investigated the partial fragment.The lot number of the part could not be read due to excessive wear on the surface of the pin.A visual review of the fragment indicates helical scalloping on the diameter of the pin.The diameter was measured at the driving end of the pin at several locations and was confirmed to be within specification.All other critical dimensions were unable to be measured due to the return of a partial fragment.The pin (part number (b)(4) is a reusable instrument that is intended to be used with the orthalign plus system.Within the instructions for use for the orthalign plus system there is a warning with an instruction for the user to inspect each instrument thoroughly prior to use for any wear or damage.Users are instructed to replace damaged or worn instruments before next use as the use of damaged instruments may compromise the surgical outcome.The investigation has not identified any anomalies in the returned pin fragment.The customer reported that there was no patient intervention and no planned intervention.This report is being filed in an abundance of caution due to the potential risks associated with retained pin fragments.
|
During a procedure of a navigated tha case, performed with orthalign plus navigation, a fixation pin broke during its attempted removal.The pin had been used to fixate the pelvic base during the and broke near the surface of the iliac crest.Upon attempted removal from the patient the pin fragmented in two.The proximal fragment was removed and has been returned to orthalign for investigation.The distal portion of the pin remains in the patients iliac wing.
|