MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ENCORE MEDICAL L.P. TURON SHOULDER; TURON KEELED GLENOID, SZ 50MM, EPLUS

Model Number 521-01-150

Device Problem Insufficient Information (3190)

Patient Problems Pain (1994); Rupture (2208)

Event Date 07/25/2018

Event Type  Injury  

Event Description

Third revision surgery - due to the patient having pain and a subscapular rupture.The pain plan was to remove the neck, head, and glenoid and revise to a reverse total shoulder.

Manufacturer Narrative

(b)(4).Manufacturer narrative: the reason for this revision surgery was due to instability and a subscapular rupture.The previous revision surgery and the revision surgery detailed in this investigation occurred 7.8 months apart.The in vivo time for the implanted device is 1.5 years.There is no information in this complaint about any patient injuries, activities, or accidents that may have contributed to the need for this revision surgery.There are no reported pre-existing patient health conditions.The healthcare professional indicated there was no delay in surgery and another suitable device was available for use.The revision surgery was completed as intended.The device was disposed of at the hospital and not made available to djo surgical for examination.A review of the implant device history records (dhr), shows that the reported component used in the previous surgery, when released for use, met design and manufacturing requirements.There were no non-conforming material reports (ncmrs) associated with the product that may have contributed to the reported event.The device was verified to have gone through an acceptable sterilization process and was within its expiration date at the time of use during the previous surgery.Customer complaint history of the reported device showed no present trends or on-going issues that are in need of review.The root cause of this complaint was a revision surgery due to instability and subscapular rupture.There were no findings during this investigation that indicate that the reported device was defective.There are multiple factors that may contribute to an event that are outside of the control of djo surgical.Inventory containment is not required as there are no indications of a product or process issue affecting implant safety or effectiveness.

Event Description

Third revision surgery - due to the patient having instability and a subscapular rupture.The pain plan was to remove the neck, head, and glenoid and revise to a reverse total shoulder.

• Brand Name: TURON SHOULDER
• Type of Device: TURON KEELED GLENOID, SZ 50MM, EPLUS
• Manufacturer (Section D): ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.; 9800 metric blvd; austin TX 78758 5445
• Manufacturer (Section G): ENCORE MEDICAL L.P.; 9800 metric blvd; austin TX 78758 5445
• Manufacturer Contact: teffany hutto ; 9800 metric blvd; austin, TX 78758-5445
• MDR Report Key: 7786631
• MDR Text Key: 117255352
• Report Number: 1644408-2018-00742
• Device Sequence Number: 1
• Product Code: PAO
• UDI-Device Identifier: 00888912145343
• UDI-Public: (01)00888912145343
• Combination Product (y/n): N
• Reporter Country Code: US
• PMA/PMN Number: K123982
• Number of Events Reported: 1
• Summary Report (Y/N): N
• Report Source: Manufacturer
• Source Type: company representative
• Reporter Occupation: Non-Healthcare Professional
• Type of Report: Initial,Followup
• Report Date: 09/07/2018

1 Device was Involved in the Event

1 Patient was Involved in the Event

• Date FDA Received: 08/15/2018
• Is this an Adverse Event Report?: Yes
• Is this a Product Problem Report?: No
• Device Operator: Health Professional
• Device Expiration Date: 08/23/2021
• Device Model Number: 521-01-150
• Device Catalogue Number: 521-01-150
• Device Lot Number: 796N1020
• Was Device Available for Evaluation?: No
• Date Manufacturer Received: 09/07/2018
• Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer?: Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
• Date Device Manufactured: 08/28/2016
• Is the Device Single Use?: Yes
• Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device?: No
• Type of Device Usage: Initial
• Patient Sequence Number: 1
• Patient Outcome(s): Required Intervention
• Patient Age: 33 YR