• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON) O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM; IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE Back to Search Results
Model Number BI-700-00027-120
Device Problems Mechanical Problem (1384); Failure to Fire (2610); Noise, Audible (3273)
Patient Problem No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
Event Date 07/24/2018
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information not provided due to japanese patient privacy regulations.A medtronic representative went to the site to test the equipment.Testing revealed that after the standalone board and x relay were replaced, the system functioned as intended.The imaging system then passed the system checkout and was found to be fully functional.Missing device manufacture date.
 
Event Description
Medtronic received information regarding an imaging system being used during a sacroiliac and thoracolumbar procedure.It was reported that during the operation, the imaging system and navigation were used.Three (3)d image was taken and transferred normally twice.In the end, in order to confirm the setting condition of the screws, when an attempt was made to take 3d image, stand alone mode was indicated on the panel of image acquisition system (ias).The central x-ray part was showed as indicator.When the image acquisition system (ias) and mobile viewing station (mvs) were rebooted, an abnormal noise sounded like ¿gee¿ was heard and the x-ray indicator was not in ¿on¿ status.The use of the imaging system was aborted and the procedure was completed with no issue.This occurred intra/peri-operatively with no delay to surgical time.There was no reported impact to patient outcome.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The standalone pcb board was returned to the manufacturer for analysis.Analysis found that the issue could be recreated.The standalone pcb board passed visual inspection, but failed bench testing.Standalone pcb powers up, all ac / dc voltages are present, both the fans are on.The 380vdc, 15vdc, and all leds are on.However, the vac is measured at 68vac while it suppose to measure at a round 110vac.Relay passed performance test.Varistor measured open, and both returned fuses are good.Standalone board failed due to low vac reading.Analysis found that the reported event was related to an electrical issue.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
O-ARM 1000 IMAGING SYSTEM
Type of Device
IMAGE-INTENSIFIED FLUOROSCOPIC X-RAY SYSTEM, MOBILE
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC. (LITTLETON)
300 foster street
littleton MA 01460
Manufacturer Contact
maxwell roth
attn:product quality experienc
826 coal creek circle
louisville, CO 80027-9710
MDR Report Key7794037
MDR Text Key117573640
Report Number1723170-2018-04096
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code OXO
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K050996
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative,foreig
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/06/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/17/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberBI-700-00027-120
Device Catalogue Number9732719
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/28/2018
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received07/24/2018
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-