The device has not been returned to the manufacturer, at this time, for evaluation.A history review of serial number (b)(4) showed no other similar complaint(s) from this serial number.The information provided by bard represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bard.
|
H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), applicable fmea documents, labeling, and applicable manufacture records.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the device was returned to the service facility for evaluation.During evaluation, the reported issue site rite 6 ultrasound and probe need evaluation/repair due possible misalignment of the image was unconfirmed.The scanner was evaluated using the multipurpose vessel phantom and the needle guide, the image were found to be aligned and normal for a site rite 6.The device was serviced, tested, and returned to the customer.A history review of serial number (b)(6) showed no other similar complaint(s) from this serial number.
|