Blank fields on this form indicate the information is unknown, or unavailable.Common name & product code = unavailable as the device is not cleared for marketing in the united states; however, same/similar device is cleared.(b)(4).This report includes information known at this time.A follow-up report will be submitted should additional relevant information become available.
|
It was reported, during stenting of the right iliac artery, the stent portion of the formula 535 vascular balloon-expandable stent slipped out from the balloon in the direction of the catheter.This occurred while positioning the stent.A second formula 535 vascular balloon-expandable stent was utilized; however, the same issue occurred.This second stent migrated in the direction of the patient's vessel.Arterial spasm was denied.Reportedly, the complaint devices were being placed through a cook introducer.The second complaint device was surgically removed during a scheduled bypass procedure.Per the complainant, the patient is "fine.".
|
Investigation evaluation: a review of the complaint history, drawings, device history record, documentation, instructions for use (ifu), manufacturing instructions, specifications, quality control was conducted during the investigation.The complaint device was not returned; therefore, no physical examination could be performed.However, a representative device returned by the complainant used during the same procedure from the same lot was examined.Additionally, a document-based investigation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.Review of the device history record of the finished product shows no nonconforming events that could contribute to this failure mode.A complaint history search revealed that there were no other reported complaints for this lot number.During the analysis of the representative device, the device passed all relevant design outputs.A document-based investigation was performed.There is no evidence to suggest the finished product was not made to specifications.Review of the device history record of the finished product shows no nonconforming events that could contribute to this failure mode.A complaint history search revealed that there was one other reported complaint for this lot number.Based on the information provided, examination of the representative product, and the results of our investigation, a definite root cause could not be determined.Per the [quality engineering] risk assessment, no further action is required.Monitoring will continue to be performed for similar complaints.This report is required by the fda under 21 cfr part 803 and is based on unconfirmed information submitted by others.Neither the submission of this report nor any statement contained herein is intended to be an admission that any cook device is defective or malfunctioned, that a death or serious injury occurred, nor that any cook device caused, contributed to, or is likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if a malfunction occurred.
|