A visual inspection of the returned device revealed it was partially distracted with score marks on the distraction rod.Functional testing revealed that the manual distractor and erc could not distract or retract the rod.Sectioning of the rod determined that the distraction rod could not be separated from the housing without use of high force.Bending forces applied to the rod from patient anatomy/activity may have caused the distraction rod to wedge into the housing tube, which would cause the failure to distract.A device history record review revealed that the magec rod met all the required quality inspections and was released within specifications.
|