Catalog Number M0035452060 |
Device Problems
Material Protrusion/Extrusion (2979); Premature Separation (4045)
|
Patient Problem
No Known Impact Or Consequence To Patient (2692)
|
Event Date 08/16/2018 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Device implanted.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during coil embolization procedure, the physician pulled back the subject coil and the main coil prematurely detached.Half of the coil remained in the aneurysm while the other half protruded, making a tail on the patient¿s vessel.The physician deployed a stent to prevent the protruded coil from blocking the patient¿s vessel.There were no clinical consequences to the patient reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device history record (dhr) review confirms that the device met all material, assembly and performance specifications.The subject device was not returned for analysis; therefore, visual, dimensional and functional testing could not be performed.In case of this complaint it is possible that the main coil prematurely detached and later protruded while getting pulled back due to some procedural factors encountered during use, possible leading to the as reported issues 'nv - main coil protrusion' and ' nv - main coil prematurely detached separated inside patient'; however, cannot be conclusively determined.The additional information provided by the customer indicated that no damage was noted to the device prior to use and the device was prepared as per direction for use (dfu).An assignable cause of undetermined was assigned to the as reported issues 'nv - main coil protrusion' and ' nv - main coil prematurely detached separated inside patient' as the device was not returned and the review and analysis of all available information failed to indicate as assignable cause.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that during coil embolization procedure, the physician pulled back the subject coil and the main coil prematurely detached.Half of the coil remained in the aneurysm while the other half protruded, making a tail on the patient¿s vessel.The physician deployed a stent to prevent the protruded coil from blocking the patient¿s vessel.There were no clinical consequences to the patient reported.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|