• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS - 3; NIP

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS - 3; NIP Back to Search Results
Catalog Number JHH100502J
Device Problem Partial Blockage (1065)
Patient Problems Occlusion (1984); Claudication (2550)
Event Date 08/07/2018
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
A review of the manufacturing records for the devices could not be conducted because the lot numbers remain unknown.It is unknown which of the two implanted devices were involved in the reported occlusion.The device information of the additional device is jhh100502j/unknown.According to the gore® viabahn® endoprosthesis with heparin bioactive surface instructions for use (ifu), complications and adverse events can occur when using any endovascular device.These complications include, but are not limited to thrombosis or occlusion.As the exact date of the device occlusion is unknown and based on the incoming information that "within a week the endoprostheses were occluded", (b)(6) 2018 will be used as an event date.
 
Event Description
On (b)(6) 2018, an iatrogenic right external iliac artery injury was developed during a thoracic endovascular aortic repair with non-gore device.Two gore® viabahn® endoprostheses with heparin bioactive surface were implanted in the right external iliac artery to repair the injury.Final angiography showed hemostasis and good blood flow.The procedure was concluded, and the patient tolerated the procedure.Medication (antiplatelet drug) was not started after the procedure as the indication was the vessel injury with bleeding.Within a week (exact date unknown), the endoprostheses were occluded.A watch-and-wait approach was elected.The physician reportedly considered as follows regarding cause of the occlusion: medication was not started, and condition of run-off vessel was not good.It was also possible that anastomosis of the right common femoral artery was not moderately done during the initial procedure.These conditions might have caused flow-limitation of the artery and the thrombotic occlusion.On (b)(6) 2018, it was decided to perform a re-intervention as the patient experienced claudication due to the occluded lesion included the whole length of the endoprostheses.Thrombectomy was performed to treat the occluded endoprostheses.The plain old balloon angioplasty (poba) was performed from the proximal right superficial femoral artery to the right common femoral artery, and a bare metal stent was implanted in the right superficial femoral artery.Final angiography showed a blood flow, and the procedure was concluded.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
GORE VIABAHN® ENDOPROSTHESIS - 3
Type of Device
NIP
Manufacturer (Section D)
W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES
flagstaff AZ
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDICAL ECHO RIDGE B/P
3250 w. kiltie lane
flagstaff AZ 86005
Manufacturer Contact
nataliya baramzina
1500 n. 4th street
9285263030
MDR Report Key7887832
MDR Text Key120692464
Report Number2017233-2018-00563
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code PFV
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
P040037
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type company representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 09/05/2018
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/18/2018
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberJHH100502J
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age81 YR
-
-